|
|
OJHAS: Vol. 4, Issue
3: (2005 Jul-Sep) |
|
|
Serological Tests Of Syphilis In HIV Infection |
|
|
Ramesh Bhat M, Professor,
Department of Skin and STD, Fr. Muller's Medical College, Mangalore - 575002 INDIA |
|
|
|
|
|
Address For Correspondence |
|
Dr.
Ramesh Bhat M,
MD; DVD; DNB, MNAMS
Professor, Dept. of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy,
Fr. Muller's Medical College,
Kankanady, Mangalore - 575002,
India
E-mail:
rameshderma@yahoo.com
|
|
|
Bhat
RM. Serological tests for syphilis in HIV infection.
Online J Health Allied Scs.2005;3:1 |
|
Submitted: Nov 5,
2005; Accepted: Nov 22, 2005; Published:
Nov 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
Serological tests for syphilis may show varying results in
association with HIV infection.Thus care should be taken to interpret these
results.
Key Words:
Serological test, Syphilis, HIV |
|
T he diagnosis of syphilis depends on clinical findings, examination of lesions
for treponemes and on serological tests. Serological tests are divided into nontreponemal
and treponemal tests. Non treponemal tests like VDRL, RPR, toluidine red unheated
serum tests can be used for screening and treponemal tests like FTAbs assay, TPHA, ELISA
etc can be used for confirmation.
There is epidemiological synergy between HIV and other STIs including syphilis. In
most patients with early HIV infection, the clinical features, response to treatment
are similar to those in non-HIV infected persons. With advancing immunosuppression
all of these may be significantly altered.
On the one hand a significant number have false positive VDRL tests due to polyclonal
B cell activation and on the other development of a new positive VDRL may be
delayed in patients with new infections. FTAbs test may be negative due to immunodeficiency. Thus
dark field examination of appropriate specimens should be performed in any patient
in whom syphilis is suspected and even if VDRL is negative.
In recent years the reliability of the serological tests for diagnosis of syphilis
in HIV infected individuals has been questioned and some have discussed that false
positive treponemal test results occur less frequently than false positive cardiolipin
antigen tests.
In a patient with positive
serum VDRL test, neurological findings and abnormal spinal fluid examination
should be considered to have neurosyphilis, regardless of CSF VDRL result.
The ability to detect treponemal DNA by PCR may be helpful in understanding
the pathogenesis of syphilis as well as the diagnosis of syphilis in HIV infected
patients and in establishing adequate treatment.
Syphilitic patients who are HIV positive are less likely to experience serologic
improvement after recommended therapy than patients who are HIV negative. Therfore
consideration should be given to design alternative therapeutic regimens.
Serologic follow up of patients treated for syphilis should include quantitative nontreponemal
tests at the end of 1,2,3 months and 3 monthly intervals thereafter. If the titer
does not decrease by two fold dilutions in 3 months for primary syphilis or with
6 months for secondary syphilis. Patient need to be reevaluated for treatment
failure or reinfection. For comparing the results same test should be performed
before and after therapy.
- Hicks CB, Benson PM, Lupton GP, Tramont EC. Seronegative secondary
syphilis in a patient infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
with Kaposi sarcoma. A diagnostic dilemma. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:492-497.
- Rusnak JM, Butzin C, McGlasson D, Blatt SP. False positive rapid
plasma reagin tests in human immunodeficiency virus infection and relationship
to anti-cardiolipin antibody and serum immunoglobulin levels. J Infect Dis
1994;169:1356-1359
- MacLean SK, Bordon J. False positive rapid reagin tests and
anticardiolipin antibodies. J Infect Dis 1995;172:905-906.
|