|
OJHAS Vol. 11, Issue 1:
(Jan-Mar 2012) |
|
|
| Effect of Wheelchair Running on Recovery of Blood
Lactate and Physical Performance after High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise – An Experimental Trial |
|
Karthikeyan G, Associate Professor, Srinivas College of Physiotherapy & Research Center, Mangalore-575001, Karnataka, India,
AG Sinha, Reader, Dept. of Physiotherapy, Punjabi University, Patiala,
JS Sandhu, Dean, Department of Sports Medicine & Physiotherapy, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address for Correspondence |
12-2-185/7, Sadguru Apartment,
Opp.Flower Market,
Car Street, Mangalore-575001,
Karnataka, India.
E-mail:
gkarthispt@yahoo.co.in |
|
|
|
|
|
Karthikeyan G, Sinha AG, Sandhu JS. Effect of Wheelchair Running on Recovery of Blood
Lactate and Physical Performance after High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise – An Experimental Trial. Online J Health Allied Scs.
2012;11(1):9 |
|
|
|
|
Submitted: Jan 7,
2012;
Accepted: Mar 20, 2012; Published: Apr 15, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
|
Background and Purpose: Repetitive sprint sport players perform
high intensity exercise only for a small percentage of a total game and such periods are often instrumental in determining the eventual
outcome. Recovery is a key factor for performance, and constant lack of recovery or insufficient recovery turns into overtraining which
is detrimental in achieving peak performance. The purpose was to find out the effect of wheelchair running on the physical performance
recovery after high-intensity intermittent exercise.
Method: Ten sportsmen having the age range from 20 to 29, VO2max Ranges from 60.51 to 64.29 were randomly divided into experimental and
control groups. After filling pre-participation questionnaire and 30-min of supine rest, Blood lactate and the field tests for the
measurement of static balance, power, speed and agility were applied. The subjects were made to run in the treadmill and to increase
the intensity to reach the Target Heart Rate (THR). After 1-min the subjects were given rest for 15-s and after that they started
exercise again and thus the subjects completed several bouts of such exercises until exhaustion followed by either Passive rest or
wheelchair running for the duration of 10 minutes. Parameters were measures after completed the exercise bout and after the recovery.
Results: After the recovery in experimental group significant improvement found only in blood lactate (p<0.01) and no significant changes
found in other parameters while in control group no significant changes found in all parameters. There was no significant difference found in
all the parameters including blood lactate between the groups. Conclusion: Both wheelchair running and passive recovery are same in the
efficiency of blood lactate removal and restoration of physical performance following intense intermittent exercise.
Key Words:
Blood lactate; Wheelchair running; Recovery; Physical
performance.
|
|
High intensity exercise can be performed continuously only for a short period of time
and energy demand fluctuate from a high to low level between the work and rest periods. Work of high intensity that it can be performed
continuously only for a short period of time is accompanied by a high rate of glycogen depletion, lactate accumulation and a greater
contribution of carbohydrate to oxidative metabolism.(1) However, when work of an equally high workload is performed with introduction
of the rest periods in between the work periods, it can be sustained for an extensive period of time and energy demand fluctuates from a
high to low level between the work and rest periods.(2) The lactate formed in fast twitch muscle fibers can diffuse out of the muscle and
enter the blood or it can shuttle directly to adjacent slow twitch muscle fibers where the lactate can be consumed as a fuel. Blood lactate
levels can be used to guide training intensity because effective training occurs when an individual trains at an exercise intensity that
corresponds to the lactate threshold i.e. the exercise intensity at which lactate begins to build up in the blood.(3,4)
Performance hindering muscular fatigue experienced during
exercise is often associated with high tissue concentrations of lactic acid.(5) Factors that could increase the rate of lactic acid
production include, increased activity of lactate dehydrogenase (due to increased activity of fast- twitch muscle fibers); increased
concentration of pyruvate in the cytoplasm (due to the failure of the Krebs cycle to keep pace with glycolytic production of pyruvate);
or increased concentration of hydrogen atoms carried as NADH + H+ (due to a failure of the hydrogen shuttle system to keep pace with
glycolytic production of hydrogen atoms). With this accumulation of lactic acid there is a corresponding increase in hydrogen ion
concentration that inhibits glycolytic reaction by inhibiting the activity of glycolytic enzymes like lactate dehydrogenase and
phosphofructokinase and interferes with excitation-contraction-coupling and cross bridge formation.(6) These effects combine to
decrease the available energy and muscle contractile force during subsequent exercise. So lactate removal from the blood following
exercise therefore appears to be of great importance in improving the subsequent performance particularly when the exercise is repeated
at high intensity.(7)
Recovery encompasses active process of re-establishing physiological
and psychological resources and states that allow the individual to use these resources again.(8) A return to pre-exercise levels of blood
lactate usually occurs within an hour and light activity during the post-exercise period has been shown to accelerate this clearance.(9-10)
The recovery strategies are designed to maintain a high rate of blood flow to the working muscles, to expedite lactic acid translocation
from the muscle cell to the blood, to accelerate the resynthesis of high energy phosphate, and to replenish oxygen in the blood, bodily
fluids and muscle myoglobin. The recovery should be sufficiently long enough to allow the next repetition to be at the same or above the
level as the previous effort, but a longer recovery should be avoided if optimum training benefit is to result. As a rule of thumb, the
heart rate should drop to approximately 120-bpm near to the end of the recovery interval. (11) During active recovery, increase in muscle
blood flow, enhances lactate exchange from active muscles to removal sites and increase the lactate oxidation, which has been described as
the major pathway of lactate metabolism.(12) So the lactic acid does not have a chance to accumulate in the muscles.(13)
Recovery from strenuous exercise is less understood but extremely
important for the athletes. While the lower limb weight bearing is not allowed even for the activities for daily living, wheelchair
locomotion can be used as a tool to maintain strength in upper body to maintain central endurance and to prevent other complications
of detraining. As well as it can be used as a method of recovery from high level work bouts of lower limb. So for very few studies
have been conducted to examine the effect of wheelchair running on the recovery following exhaustive bouts of intermittent exercises.
Therefore the present study aims at examining the effect of wheelchair running on the recovery from an exhaustive bout of intermittent
exercises. It is hypothesized that there will be significant difference between wheelchair running as an active recovery tool and passive
recovery in enhancing the recovery after the high intensity intermittent exercises. The objectives were,
To determine the effects of passive recovery on the recovery of field test parameters and Blood lactate.
To determine the effects of wheelchair running on the recovery of Blood lactate and field test parameters.
-
To compare the effects of passive recovery and wheelchair running on the recovery of field test parameters and blood lactate.
Subjects:
This experimental research consisted of 10 sportsmen having
the age: 24.9 ± 2.47 years (range 20-29], height: 169.4 ± 4.1 cms (range 160-176), weight: 69 ± 5.53 kgms (60-78),
VO2max: 62.41± 0.99 ml/kg/min (range 60.51- 64.29) were randomly divided into two equal groups.
Subjects were university sports players from Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India. All the subjects were informed of the nature,
purpose and parameters of the study before giving their voluntary consent to participate in this study 3 days prior to the actual
experiment. Only male athletes and players with minimum 3 years of sports training and with the maximal oxygen uptake
more than 60 ml/kg/min were included in the study. Subjects with any musculoskeletal pain, recent injury, undergoing any
medications or having any cardio-respiratory difficulties were excluded from the study.
Materials:
A pre-participation questionnaire was used to select the subjects
to fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria based on which the subjects were selected. A Lactate Analyzer (Analox –
PLM5 Portable) with the set of capillaries for collection of blood samples, POLAR short range heart rate telemetry (POLAR S410TM),
Non-motorized treadmill, Wheelchair, Stopwatch, Metronome, Wooden stepping bench of 16.25” height, Measuring tape were used
for data collection.
Experimental protocol:
The subjects attended pre-participation screening phase
3-days prior to the actual experiment in which they were asked to fill the screening questionnaire. Maximal oxygen uptake
(VO2max) of the each subject was measured on the same day of screening, using Queen’s college step test.(14) On the day of the
experiment the subjects after 8 – 9 hours of prior meal, came to the department where the experiment was conducted. After 30-min
of supine rest, Blood lactate concentration was measured with the subjects in supine position and the field tests including Stork
Stand test(15), Vertical jump test(16), 50-yard sprint test(17), and 10-yard shuttle run test(17) for the measurement of static
balance, power, speed and agility were applied according to the previously described guidelines. All these values were noted as the
baseline values (Pre-exercise values).
Then the subjects were made to run in the treadmill
with wearing the POLAR short-range telemetry strap on the chest and the monitoring watch in their wrist. The subjects were asked
to increase the intensity of running such a way they should reach the Target Heart Rate (THR). After 1-min the subjects were given
rest for 15-s and after that period of rest subjects started exercise again to reach the THR. Thus the subjects completed several bouts
of such exercises until exhaustion. After the exercise bout all the exercise parameters were measured and the values were recorded as
Post- exercise values.
Then the subjects were then randomly assigned to go to the
recovery either Passive rest or wheelchair running on level tar road for the duration of 10 minutes. During the wheelchair running,
heart rate was monitored continuously to not to exceed the calculated 40% HRmax. Immediately after the recovery all the parameters
were measured (Post-recovery values).
Statistical Analysis:
Descriptive statistics was used to calculate the mean,
Standard deviation and standard error for the purpose of summarizing the data and for further analysis for the difference
between the groups. Paired samples t test was used to compare the within group effectiveness between the pre test and the
post test measurements. To compare the effectiveness between the groups independent sample t test were used. The p level
was kept as 0.05 and less than that level was considered as significant. All data were analyzed using SPSS 11.5 software.
All the subjects completed the experiment successfully
and the collected data were tabulated and assessed statistically. In the experimental group after the recovery no
significant increase was observed in all the parameters except the Stork stand where significant increase (p<0.05) and in
blood lactate where highly significant decrease (p<0.01) were found (Table 1). The mean post-recovery values for Stork
stand, Jump, Sprint, Shuttle run and Blood lactate values are 17.18-s, 29.82cms, 7.40-s, 10.29-s and 7.0mmol/l, while
post-exercise mean values for the same are 9.62-s, 29cms, 7.87-s, 11.69-s and 11.8mmol/l, respectively. The overall
percentage improvement of post-recovery Stork stand, Vertical jump, Sprint, and Shuttle run performance are 78.6%, 2.8%,
6%, 12% respectively and 40.7% decrease in Blood lactate.
|
Table 1: Intra-group comparison of parameters between post-exercise and post recovery in experimental group. |
| Parameters |
Post-exercise |
Post-recovery |
% Change |
`t’ value |
P
level |
|
Mean |
S.D |
S.E |
Mean |
S.D |
S.E |
| Stork stand (Secs) |
9.62 |
3.64 |
1.63 |
17.18 |
5.88 |
2.63 |
78.6
↑ |
2.45 |
< 0.05 |
| Vertical jump (Cms) |
29.0 |
6.10 |
2.73 |
29.82 |
6.07 |
2.72 |
2.8
↑ |
0.21 |
NS |
| Sprint (Secs) |
7.87 |
0.54 |
0.24 |
7.40 |
0.66 |
0.29 |
6.0
↑ |
1.23 |
NS |
| Shuttle run (Secs) |
11.69 |
1.66 |
0.74 |
10.29 |
0.71 |
0.32 |
12
↑ |
1.74 |
NS |
| Blood lactate (mmol/l) |
11.8 |
2.23 |
1.0 |
7.0 |
1.44 |
0.64 |
40.7
¯ |
4.05 |
< 0.01 |
|
NS - Non-significant,
↑ - increased,
¯ - decreased |
In control group also after the recovery no significant
increase was observed in all the parameters including Blood lactate (Table 2). The mean post-recovery values for Stork stand, Jump,
Sprint, Shuttle run and Blood lactate values are 16.74-s, 34.3cms, 7.21-s, and 11.02-s, 7.76mmol/l, respectively while
post-exercise mean values are 9.49, 33.3, 7.57, 10.67and 10.06mmol/l respectively. The respective percentage of increased
post-recovery mean values for Stork stand, Vertical jump, Sprint, and Shuttle run were 76.4%, 3%, 5%, and 3.3%, respectively and
22.9% decrease in Blood lactate.
|
Table 2: Intra-group comparison of field test parameters between post-exercise and post recovery in control group. |
Parameters |
Post-exercise |
Post-recovery |
% Change |
`t’ value |
P
Level |
Mean |
S.D |
S.E |
Mean |
S.D |
S.E |
Stork stand (Secs) |
9.49 |
5.68 |
2.54 |
16.74 |
12.48 |
5.58 |
76.4
↑ |
1.18 |
NS |
Vertical jump (Cms) |
33.3 |
10.07 |
4.50 |
34.3 |
9.71 |
4.34 |
3↑ |
0.16 |
NS |
Sprint (Secs) |
7.57 |
0.52 |
0.23 |
7.21 |
0.38 |
0.17 |
4.8
↑ |
1.25 |
NS |
Shuttle run (Secs) |
10.67 |
0.56 |
0.25 |
11.02 |
0.98 |
0.44 |
3.3
¯ |
0.67 |
NS |
| Blood lactate (mmol/l) |
10.06 |
2.25 |
1.01 |
7.76 |
2.70 |
1.21 |
22.9
¯ |
1.46 |
NS |
|
NS - Non-significant,
↑ - increased,
¯-decreased |
In comparison of post-recovery field test and Blood lactate
parameters between experimental and control groups the result showed no significant difference in all the parameters between
the two groups (Table 3).
Table 3: Intergroup comparison of post-recovery values between experimental and control group. |
| Parameters |
Experimental |
Control |
`t’ value |
P level |
|
Mean |
S.D |
S.E |
Mean |
S.D |
S.E |
| Stork Stand |
17.18 |
5.88 |
2.63 |
16.74 |
12.48 |
5.58 |
0.07 |
NS |
| Vertical jump |
29.82 |
6.07 |
2.72 |
34.3 |
9.71 |
4.37 |
0.87 |
NS |
| Sprint |
7.4 |
0.66 |
0.29 |
7.21 |
0.38 |
0.17 |
0.57 |
NS |
| Shuttle run |
10.29 |
0.71 |
0.32 |
11.02 |
0.98 |
0.44 |
1.34 |
NS |
| Blood lactate (mmol/l) |
7.0 |
1.44 |
0.64 |
7.76 |
2.7 |
1.21 |
0.56 |
NS |
| NS - Non-significant |
During exercise, particularly short-term high intensity exercise,
muscles produce lactate rapidly, whereas lactate clearance is slowed. Later during recovery from short-
term exercise, there is net lactate uptake from the blood by resting muscles or other muscles that are
doing mild to moderate exercise.(18) The ability to maintain a high power output during high-intensity
intermittent exercise was impaired when oxygen availability was reduced by acute hypoxia, which was associated
with a higher accumulation of blood lactate.(19) Therefore, lactic acid removal after exercise had been considered
critical for the resumption of exercise, especially during athletic competition involving repetitive high-intensity
activities. Since it has been suggested that muscles engaged in heavy exercise will negatively affect the performance
in other non-exercised muscles(20), the use of non-maximally exercised muscles during active recovery of low-intensity
i.e. below the lactate threshold theoretically could be beneficial on the subsequent repeated performances of the
maximally exercised muscle groups.
In this study blood lactate significantly increased (p<0.001)
in both the groups after the exercise from the resting level to the mean increase of 9.48 ± 2.67mmol/l (WC) and 8.70 ± 2.16 mol/l (PR).
Ferrauti et al.(21) also found significant elevation of BLC (9.04 ± 3.06mmol/l, p<0.01) after intermittent sprint running training in
tennis players. Various authors reported that light aerobic work during recovery below the anaerobic threshold, maintain an elevated
state of metabolism and substrate utilization by the active tissues, results in faster decrease in lactate concentration and acidity
in muscle and blood.(22-26) In this study the blood lactate after 10 min of recovery decreased from the resting level significantly
(p<0.001) in WC group [mean value 4.8 ± 2.08mmol/l], while no significant decrease was observed in PR group [mean reduction,
3.22 ± 2.1mmol/l]. The reason for blood lactate reduction after wheelchair running recovery is the increased rate of metabolic
clearance during exercise than compared to the rest during recovery. But statistically no significant difference in lactate
reduction was found between the WC and PR groups. during passive recovery the lactate is not needed as fuel and could
therefore contribute to the resynthesis of glycogen which takes longer time, whereby the reason for the non-significant
decrease in wheelchair running than the passive recovery may be due to the fact that recovery exercises performed by the
muscles other than those that were fatigued could have led a arterial hypotension through plasma fluid loss and additional
vasodilatation depending on the muscle mass involved.(27) Active arm recovery might have also caused vasoconstriction in
resting lactacid muscles leading to a slower release of lactate. Baker and King (28) reported that low-intensity leg
exercise to be more effective in promoting lactate clearance during a 30-min recovery period after exhaustive arm exercise
than either passive recovery or low-intensity arm exercise and no significant difference in lactate clearance was reported
between the arm exercise and rest [mean value, 4.3 ± 0.8(arm), 5.6 ± 1.6(rest)]. But here the high-intensity exercise mode
and active arm recovery mode were same type of exercise in contrast to the present study methodology.
Balance, power, speed and agility are necessary in delivering
the sports performance. The quality i.e. the movement pattern and coordination of specific actions in the sports games are
largely dependent on the physiological strain produced during short-term intermittent exercise.(21) It was speculated that
elevated levels of blood lactate should have an adverse effect on muscle function.(29) In addition, several studies had
suggested that work performance is adversely affected by elevated levels of lactate (7,30) and the accumulation of H+,
inorganic phosphate and H2PO4- in the muscle cell may directly impair the activation of the contractile mechanism.(31)
Increased accumulation of the lactate which result in fatigue of the muscles lead to a decreased ability to generate
powerful contraction and reduced proprioceptive impulses of fatigued muscles due to depletion of energy sources and fluid
loss result in decreased balance and coordination. After 10 min of recovery balance timing was improved significantly (p<0.05) in
WC group with the mean timing difference of 8.25 ± 7.74-s while no significant difference was noted in PR group (mean timing difference,
7.25 ± 7.57-s). This may be due to the psychological benefits from active recovery that most of the athletes want to be active to
taper off the exercise.(32) But no significant difference in the improvement after recovery between the groups shows that the
effect of passive and wheelchair running recovery modalities are same in preserving the performance after the high intensity
intermittent exercise.
Testing the jumping ability measure the ability to
expend maximum energy in one explosive act, projecting the body through the space. We used the vertical jump test
described by Texas Governor’s Commission. Some studies associated the decreased lactate levels through active
recovery, with a corresponding increase in power output, than compared with passive recovery.(7,33) But it had been
stated that reduction in muscular power during intermittent running and cycling was related to the increase of blood
lactate concentration (34) and PCr resynthesis rate.(35) after the recovery vertical jump performance had not improved
significantly in both the groups [mean differences were 1.42 ± 1.06cms (WC), and 1.0 ± 1.41cms (PR)] in this study
moreover there was no significant difference between the groups, indicates no beneficial effect of wheelchair running
recovery than passive recovery regarding the preservation of power output after the intense exercise. Therefore the
lack of deterioration in muscle function in relation to increased BLC may be in part attributed to the non-linear
relationship between intramuscular pH and blood lactate. Similar findings were reported by (36,37) who found no
difference in maximal effort exercise following 20min of either active or passive recovery with a blood lactate
varying from 5-12mM prior to the next performance.
The result of the 50yard sprint also showed no
significant decrease after the supramaximal exercise bouts (mean reduction difference were, 0.28 ± 0.1-s for
WC, and 0.49 ± 0.35-s for PR). After the 10min of recovery also there is no significant increase in the sprint
performance in both the groups (mean difference were, 0.48 ± 0.57-s for WC, and 0.38 ± 0.39-s for PR) in
accordance with the previous findings (30) stated that unaffected subsequent muscle function after the
recovery modes. This indicates the no difference of the wheelchair running recovery ahead of the passive
recovery in improving the motor ability of the athletes after the high-intensity intermittent exercise.
Additionally, results of this study may reflect other possible consequences of a fall in muscle pH, such
as an impairment of muscle mechanical function (29) or a negative influence on central nervous activation.(38)
Shuttle run performance, another field test of
agility also shows no significant decrease after the exercise bout from the resting values in both groups (mean
difference in the timing, 0.91 ± 0.69-s for WC group, and 0.19 ± 0.10-s for PR group), but the reduction in
performance shows significant difference (p<0.05) between the two groups i.e. it was reduced a 2.5% in WC
group and a 1.7% in PR group. After the recovery, both groups showed significant difference (p<0.05) in
improvement of shuttle run performance (mean difference were, 1.4 ± 1.06-s in WC group, and 3.48 ± 1.54-s in
PR group) in which the post-recovery shuttle run performance improvement was 12% more than the resting levels in
WC group while in PR group it was 3.3% less than the resting level. This indicates that wheelchair running recovery
have improved the shuttle run performance than the passive recovery. The reason for the improved shuttle run in our
study after wheelchair running may be due to the better elimination of lactate and better psychological recovery
than passive recovery.
Overall no difference in enhancing recovery
from high intensity intermittent exercise and the preservation or improving all the field test performance
except in shuttle run where WC improved performance found between the wheelchair running (active arm) recovery
and passive rest recovery in our study. Though it was well documented that the removal of lactate was faster
following exercises at a reduced intensity,(7,39) the mode of exercise incorporated during the recovery phase
in most of these studies was similar to that used to produce lactate in the first exercise i.e. leg exercise.
In the present study it was focused in examining the effectiveness of contrasting modes of exercise on removal
rate of lactate, physical tests and subsequent performance. So wheelchair running was used as a mode of active
arm recovery after the high intensity intermittent running exercise on a treadmill until exhaustion. The result
seem to indicate that no clear advantage is afforded to the athlete who assumes the wheelchair running following
strenuous exercise than the passive rest and in fact it appears to be, absolutely no difference between supine
recovery and wheelchair running perhaps both the modalities resulted in enhancing recovery. The result seem to
indicate that no clear advantage is afforded to the athlete who assumes the wheelchair running following strenuous
exercise than the passive rest and in fact it appears to be, absolutely no difference between supine recovery and
wheelchair running.
The present study has its own limitations
with the respect to size of the sample and also on only male athletes included. Though we informed previously
to subjects that they should be abstained from food 8-9 hours and water for 3 hours prior to the experiment,
we couldn’t control the nutritional status of the subjects at the time of the experiment. Moreover the
psychological factors of the subjects were out of control while experiments as the subjects were selected
for the study 3 days prior to the actual experiment.
It is concluded that both wheelchair running and passive recovery are same in the efficiency of blood
lactate removal and restoration of physical performance following intense intermittent exercise with wheelchair running
exerting no noteworthy effect on the physical performance tests of stork stand, vertical jump, sprint and shuttle run than
passive recovery.
There is a need to conduct some further studies on the related areas
such as,
-
Wheelchair running recovery should be compared to the
other active arm and leg recovery modalities.
-
The potential effects of nutrition on active and passive
recovery effectiveness should be studied.
-
Further studies should focus on the physiological response,
blood haemotocrit response and hormonal response to these exercise and recovery modalities.
Authors would like to acknowledge the athletes who participated in this study as volunteers.
- Pruett EDR. FFA mobilization during and after prolonged severe muscular work in men.
J Appl Physiol. 1970;29:809-815.
- Astrand I, Astrand PO,
Christensen EH, Hedman R. Intermittent muscular work. Acta Physiol Scand. 1960;50:269-286.
- Beneke R. Anaerobic threshold, individual anaerobic threshold, and maximal lactate steady state in rowing. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Jun;27(6):863.
- Foxdal P, Sjodin B, Sjodin A, Ostman B. The validity and accuracy of blood lactate measurements for prediction of maximal endurance running capacity. Dependency of analyzed blood media in combination with different designs of the exercise test. Int J Sports Med. Feb 1994;15(2):89-95.
- Stone MH, Pierce K, Godsen R, Wilson D, Blessing R. Heart rate and lactate levels during weight-training in trained and untrained men. Phys Sportsmed. 1987;15(5):97-105.
- Astrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of Work Physiology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1977.
pp 167-169.
- Ahmaidi S, Granier P, Taoutaou Z, Mercier J, Dubouchaud
H, Prefaut C. Effects of active recovery on plasma lactate and anaerobic power following repeated intensive exercise.
Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1996;28(4):450-456.
Kellmann M, Kallus KW. Mood, Recovery-Stress State, and Regeneration.
(Chapter 8). In: Lehmann M, Foster
C, Gastmann U, Keizer
H, Steinacker J.
(Eds.)
Overload, Performance Incompetence, and Regeneration in
Sport. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 1999. pp:101-117.
- Gollnick PD, Bayly WM, Hodgson DR. Exercise intensity, training, diet, and lactate concentration in muscle and blood. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Jun 1986;18(3):334-340.
- Freund H, Gendry P. Lactate kinetics after short strenuous exercise in man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. Aug 1978;39(2):123-135.
- Powers SK, Howley ET.
Exercise physiology: theory and application to fitness and performance. 2nd
ed. Brown & Benchmark Publishers;
Madison, Wis. 1994. pp.171-258.
- Brooks GA, Gaesser GA. End points of lactate and glucose metabolism after exhausting exercise.
J Appl Physiol. 1980;49:1057-1069.
- Kellmann M. Enhancing Recovery- Preventing underperformance in athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2002.
- McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise Physiology- Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1981.
- Johnson BL, Nelson JK. Practical Movements for Evaluation in Physical Education. 3rd ed. Chapter-14: The measurement of balance. Surjeet Publications, India, 1982.
- Texas Governer’s Commission on Physical Fitness. 1973. Physical fitness – Motor Ability Tests. Austin, TX.
- American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation. Youth Fitness Test Manual. Washington,DC: AAHPER.1976.
- Gladden LB. Muscle as a consumer of lactate.
Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2000;32(4):764-771.
- Balosm PD, Seger JY, Sjodin
B, Ekblom B. Maximal-intensity intermittent exercise: effect of recovery duration.
Int J Sports Med. 1992;13(7):528-533.
- Karlsson J, Bonde-Petersen F, Henriksson
J, Knuttgen HG. Effects of previous exercise with arms and legs on metabolism and performance in exhaustive exercise.
J Appl Physiol. 1975;38(5):763-767.
- Ferrauti A, Pluim BM, Weber K. The effect of recovery duration on running speed and stroke quality during intermittent training drills in elite tennis players.
J Sports Sci. 2001;19:235–242.
- Belcastro AN, Bonen A. Lactic acid removal rates during controlled and uncontrolled recovery exercise.
J Appl Physiol. 1975;39:932-937.
- Hermansen L, Stensvold I. Production and removal of lactate during exercise in man.
Acta Physiol Scand. 1972;86:191–201.
- Gisolfi C, Robinson S, Turrell ES. Efficacy of aerobic performed during recovery from exhausting work.
J Appl Physiol. 1966;21(6): 1767-1772.
- Stamford BA, Weltman A, Moffatt
R, Sady S. Exercise recovery above and below the anaerobic threshold following maximal work.
J Appl Physiol: Respirat Environ Exer Physiol. 1981;51:840-844.
- Choi D, Cole KJ, Goodpaster BH, et al. Effect of passive and active recovery on the resynthesis of muscle glycogen.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(8):992–996.
- Hildebrandt W, Schutze H, Stegemann J. Cardiovascular limitations of active recovery from strenuous exercise.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 1992;64:250–257.
- Baker SJ, King N. Lactic acid recovery profiles following exhaustive arm exercise on a canoeing ergometer.
Br J Sports Med. 1991;25(3):165-167.
- Tesch P. Muscle fatigue in man – with special reference to lactate accumulation during short term intense exercise.
Acta Physiol Scand (suppl) 1980;480.
- Bond V, Adams RG, Tearney RG, et al. Effect of active and passive recovery on lactate removal and subsequent isokinetic muscle function.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1991;31:357-361.
- Hermansen L. Effect of metabolic changes on force generation in skeletal muscle during maximal exercise. In: Ciba Foundation Symposium, Vol
82, Human Muscle Fatigue: Physiological Mechanisms, ed. Porter J and Whelan R. Pitman Medical, London 1981.
pp 75–88.
- Mujika I, Padilla S. Scientific basis for precompetition tapering strategies.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
2003;35:1182-1187.
- Thiriet P, Gozal D, Wouassi D, et al. The effect of various recovery modalities on subsequent performances in consecutive supra-maximal exercise.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1993;33 118–129.
- Holmyard DJ, Cheetham ME, Lakomy HKA. Effect of recovery duration on performance during multiple treadmill sprints. In: Reilly T, Lees A, Davids K, Murphy WJ. Eds. Science and Football. London: E & FN Spon 1988.
pp 134–142.
- Blonc S, Casas H, Duche P, et al. Effect of recovery duration on the force-velocity relationship.
Int J Spots Med. 1998;19:272-276.
- Weltman A, Stamford BA,
Moffat RJ, Katch VL. Exercise recovery, lactate removal and subsequent high intensity exercise performance.
Res Quart. 1982;48:786–796.
- Weltman A, Weltman JY, Kanaley JA, et al. Repeated bouts of exercise alter the blood lactate – RPE relation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(7):1113–1117.
- Asmussen E. Muscle fatigue.
Med Sci Sports. 1979;11:313–321.
-
Micklewright DP, Beneke R, Gladwell V, Sellens
MH. Blood Lactate Removal Using Combined Massage and Active Recovery.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
May 2003;35(5)
Supplement 1:S317
|
