|
|
OJHAS Vol. 6, Issue
2: (2007 Apr-Jun) |
|
|
Serological Survey Of Salmonella gallinarum Antibody In Chickens Around Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. |
|
Okwori AEJ, Department of Medical
Microbiology, Federal College of Veterinary and Medical Laboratory Technology,
Vom Hashimu GA, Bacterial Vaccine Department, National Veterinary research Institute,
Vom Adetunji JA, Department of chemical Pathology, Jos University Teaching
Hospital, Jos. Okeke IO, Department of Medical
Microbiology, Federal College of Veterinary and Medical Laboratory Technology,
Vom Junaid SA Department of Medical
Microbiology, Federal College of Veterinary and Medical Laboratory Technology,
Vom |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address For Correspondence |
A.E.J. Okwori Department of Medical
Microbiology, Federal College of Veterinary and Medical Laboratory Technology,
Vom
E-mail:
Okwori2001@yahoo.com
|
|
|
|
|
Okwori AEJ, Hashimu GA, Adetunji JA, Okeke IO, Junaid SA. Serological Survey Of Salmonella
gallinarum Antibody In Chickens Around Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria.
Online J Health Allied Scs. 2007;2:2 |
|
Submitted May 15, 2007; Accepted:
Oct 6, 2007; Published: Nov 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
A serological survey of the
prevalence of antibodies to Salmonella gallinarum among chickens
under two different management systems around Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
was carried out using the standard plate agglutination test. The objective
of this study was to determine serologically the prevalence of antibodies
against Salmonella gallinarum among apparently healthy chickens
around Jos. A total of 700 serum samples made up of 450 exotic
and 250 local breed of chickens were used for this study with 37.9%
seropositvity. In the free range system (19.3%) of the flocks
sampled were seropositive for Salmonella gallinarium
antibodies while in the semi intensive, 18.6% of the flock tested positive.
The serum agglutination test (SAT) was adapted to the microtitre format
used to determine somatic and flagella titres. The antigen used for
this study was specific for S. gallinarum, hence differentiation
between species infection was assessed in this study. Perhaps the most
feasible way to eradicate the disease is to encourage farmers (both
small and large scale) to break the disease cycle at their levels by
embarking on prompt and regular vaccination programmes. It is thus
concluded that salmonella gallinarum (fowl typhoid) is present
in the area investigated. Fowl typhoid may continue to have a negative
effect on the economy of poultry production in Nigeria if not
controlled. A statistical analysis was precluded due to inadequate data
sets.
Key Words:
Fowl typhoid, Antibodies, Chickens, Jos, Nigeria |
|
Fowl typhoid
is caused by the bacterium Salmonella gallinarum, a member of
the family Enterobacteriaceae widely distributed throughout the
world, but have been eradicated from commercial poultry in many developed
countries of western Europe, the United States of America (USA), Canada,
Australia and Japan with an intensive poultry industry.(1) The disease
(Fowl typhoid) is of particular economic importance in those countries
which are beginning to intensify their industry, eg countries in Latin
America, south America, the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent
and parts of Africa.(2) In Africa for example, fowl typhoid has been
reported in many countries including Nigeria (3), Tanzania (4), Uganda
(5), Zambia (6), Libya (7), Senegal (8) and Morocco.(9) Salmonella has
been of great concern to the poultry industry ever since man began raising
poultry in a concentrated fashion.
Salmonella
gallinarum is highly host adapted and seldom causes significant problems
in host other than chickens, turkeys and pheasants.(10) It was formerly
known as Shigella gallinarum when first isolated in 1989 by Klein
in England.(2)
Fowl typhoid
infection usually follows the ingestion of food or water contaminated
by the excreta of clinically infected birds or carriers and can also
be transmitted by attendants through hands, feet and clothes.(11)
Fowl typhoid
seriously threatened the poultry industry in the early 1900s due to widespread
outbreaks accompanied by high mortality.(2)
The majority
of the strains of S. gallinarum is very similar at the chromosomal
level.(12)
A definitive
diagnoses of fowl typhoid requires the isolation and identification
of S. gallinarum. However, a tentative diagnoses can be
made based on the flock history, clinical signs mortality and lesions.
Positive serological findings are of great value in detecting infection.(13)
In Nigeria,
various serotypes of Salmonella species have been isolated from apparently
healthy chickens with a carrier rate of 1.3% in 300 broilers as reported
by Falade and Elizokhale.(14)
The aim of
this study was to determine the prevalence of Salmonella gallinarum
antibodies in vaccinated and non vaccinated birds and to advice farmers
where asymptomatic infection in unvaccinated birds are identified.
Reference
Sera
Adult
chickens with no signs of clinical Salmonellosis were inoculated intra-muscularly
with 0.5ml of inactivated cultures of Salmonella gallinarum (108
cfu/ml) to obtain immunological responses specific to Salmonella
gallinarum. Sera samples were there after collected after 5-14 days
and stored as positive control. Negative serum samples to Salmonella
was also obtained from the Poultry Department, National Veterinary Research
Institute, Vom. All serum samples were stored at –20oC,
until required for use. Seven hundred (700) randomly selected flocks
from free-range and semi-intensive poultry systems were used for this
study. The two poultry management systems were defined as free
range flock and semi intensive flock (Back yard).
Free Range
Flock
These are not
under any form of confinement and usually roam about the environment only to
return to house hold at dusk, predominantly owned by families or household
consisting of local breed of chickens.
Semi Intensive
Flock (Back Yard)
Chickens in
this group consist of those under confinement in either deep litter or cages.
A maximum population of 1500-3000 chickens were allowed into this class.
Serum
Samples
Blood samples
were collected from both local and exotic chickens in Vom and Bukuru.
Approximately 2ml of blood was drawn from the wing vein aseptically
into sterile bijou bottles. Blood samples were kept in slant position
and allowed clot at room temperature, stored overnight at 4oC
and spun at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes.
Serum samples
were collected using sterile Pasteur pipettes, labeled and stored frozen
at –20oC in bijou bottles and small vials until required.
Preparation
And Standardization Of Stained Antigen
Lyophilized
reference strains of S. gallinarum was obtained from the Fowl
Typhoid Vaccine Department, National Veterinary Research Institute, Vom.
The strains were inoculated into trytose broth, incubated at 370C
and subsequently subcultured onto nutrient agar containing
1/800 phenol. This inactivates the Vi antigen
(if present) which could mask O antigen and to obtain much growth. The
cultures were incubated at 37oC for 24 hours. Bacteria growth
on the surfaces of the plates were harvested into 10ml of nutrient broth,
emulsified thoroughly and 20 times the volume of absolute alcohol was
added. Heated for 30minutes at 56oC, centrifuged hard,
and re-suspended deposit in 0.2% formol saline solution. Tinged with
crystal violet. Standardized by an opacity method to 750 x 106
organisms/ml using 0.2% formal saline and controlled using fowl typhoid
vaccine as the standard reference antigen.
Serological
Test
The standard
plate agglutination test was used (15). Reagents used were the prepared
S. gallinarum stained antigen. The reagent was allowed to warm up
to room temperature prior to use.
Using a sterile
Pasteur pipette, 0.02ml of the sera was dispensed on a tile and 0.02ml of the
antigen was added using separate sterile pipette. Antigen and sera were properly
mixed with wooden applicator sticks, the tile plate was gently rocked for a few
seconds and reaction read within 2 minutes. Known positive and negative sera
were tested simultaneously on each day of testing. Test serum samples giving
visible agglutination were considered positive. While those that does not
give visible agglutination were considered negative.
Of the seven hundred
(700) birds screened from Vom and Bukuru, sixty six (66) (9.4%) of the
flocks tested positive to S. gallinarum
antibodies. Both the exotic and local birds (250) screened from Vom
area gave 28 (19%) positive reaction. While those from Bukuru
area (450) similarly gave 34 (18.9%) positive reaction. In the
free range system 9.6% of the flock sampled were seropositive for
S. gallinarum antibodies. 9.3% of the semi intensive samples tested
positive to S. gallinarum antibodies (Table 2).
Table 1: Distribution of
serum samples among exotic and local birds screened |
Location |
Exotic birds |
Local birds |
Total |
Vom |
200 |
100 |
300 |
Bukuru |
250 |
150 |
400 |
Total |
450 |
250 |
700 |
|
Table 2:
Salmonella gallinarum antibody in chickens raised
under two different management systems |
Location |
Type of birds |
Number of birds tested |
Number positive |
Vom |
Exotic |
200 |
18 |
Local |
100 |
10 |
Bukuru |
Exotic |
250 |
24 |
Local |
150 |
14 |
Total |
|
700 |
66 |
|
Table 3:
Percentage prevalence of Salmonella gallinarum antibodies in
chickens from the two different management systems |
Location |
Exotic birds (%)
|
Local birds (%)
|
Total (%) |
Vom |
9.0 |
10 |
19 |
Bukuru |
9.6 |
9.3 |
18.9 |
Total |
18.6 |
19.3 |
37.9 |
In
most African countries, the chicken has no regular health control programme,
may or may not have shelter and scavenge for most of their nutritional
needs throughout life. These may of course account for persistent outbreak
of poultry diseases documented to be easily transmitted through contact
and aerosol.(16) The major diseases of poultry in Africa that have
been prominently identified in commercial poultry flocks are Newcastle
disease, Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) or Gumboro, Marek’s disease
(MD), fowl typhoid, cholera, mycoplasmosis and coccidiosis.(17) Unlike
avian parathyphiod Salmonella serotypes, Salmonella enterica serotypes
gallinarum and pullorum are not frequently excreted in chicken
faeces, but infected birds tend to produce humoral response.(13) Breeding
flocks must be free of Salmonella gallinarum and pullorum, therefore,
it is very important to detect them as soon as possible to prevent both
disease and dissemination. Serological diagnosis of Fowl typhoid disease
in poultry industry among other measures has utilized macroscopic tube
agglutination test which predominantly detects lgm antibody to cell
wall LPS antigen. (13,17) This can be adapted to the microtitre
format and can be readily used to determine somatic and flagellar titres
as demonstrated in this study.(19) Besides being a very simple method,
this test has also been very useful for the control and eradication
of Salmonellosis.(20) In order to specifically determine fowl typhoid
disease, it could be essential to serologically differentiate these
diseases from infections caused by other invasive Salmonella serotypes,
including typhimurium and enteritidis and some other serotypes in
group D, which might induce cross reactivity among circulating
IgG antibodies following oral infection.(13,21)
Relatively
high percentage of flocks from the two poultry farms located in Vom
and Bukuru management systems had chickens with Salmonella gallinarum
agglutinins and should be of concern. This is because the flocks
had widespread distribution despite the fact that the birds
were not vaccinated. This is suggestive of a high exposure rate of chickens
to Salmonella gallinarum around Vom and Bukuru. Similarly
Falade and Ehizokhale (14) have isolated different Salmonella
serotypes from animal species including poultry in Nigeria.
The
low prevalence rate documented in this study could be a reflection of
intensification coupled with the deep litter form of management practiced
currently in Jos and its environ. Interestingly, the semi-intensive
system recorded a lower prevalence of S. gallinarum antibody
in chickens than the free-range system, despite relative intensification
in the former. This could be explained, in part, by the fact that chickens
in the free-range system move about more freely thus increasing exposure
rate to S. gallinarum. Chickens in the semi-intensive flocks
however, remain under confinement in deep litters or cages, and with
good management. Hence could be free of S.
gallinarum disease if the day-old chicks were from disease free
farms. Incidentally, a great proportion of semi-intensive poultry
farmers in Vom and Bukuru area acquired their day-old chicks from
where S. gallinarum disease eradication programmes have been
successful.(22)
These
results are comparable with other surveys in Africa, although knowledge
on the prevalence of disease in Africa poultry seems to be rather limited.(23) Chryosostome et al, (24) in a similar study documented
the presence of antibodies to S. gallinarum among chickens in
Benin City, Nigeria. The overall prevalence of 9.4% found in all
chickens sampled in Vom and Bukuru appears very high when compared with
other reports from different parts of Nigeria. Onunkwo and Onoviran
(25) reported S. gallinarum antibody prevalence in Plateaus State
to be 3.2%. This variation could be due to differences in environmental
contamination and management systems. Long term cohort studies
examining the causes of poultry mortality have not been carried out
in the free range production systems.
Unlike the
findings of Oliveira et al, (26) which assessed the ability of
an immunoenzymatic assay performed with either peroxidase or alkaline
phosphatase conjugates to investigate serological response to a soluble
protein antigen from S. gallinarum, the present study has addressed
the simple antibody detection as the antigen was capable of promoting
reliable serological reaction as suggested by Barrow et al, (13)
and Iba et al.(27) This study is further buttressed by
the findings of Bauzoubaa et al, (9) who in Morocco revealed
that up to 58% of the village chickens had antibodies against S.
gallinarum and S. pollorum. Similar findings were reported
in Nigeria by Adesiyun et al.(28) There is no doubt that
the disease play an important role in village poultry and semi-intensive
poultry in Nigeria.
In conclusion
regular blood testing and depopulation of infected flocks have enormously
reduced the prevalence of S. gallinarum in other countries, but
this approach is seldom practicable in Nigeria.
-
Officer International
Des Epizooties (OIE) Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial
Animals (Fowl Typhoid and Pullorum Disease) 2004.
-
Shivaprasad
HL. Fowl Typhoid and Pullorum. Disease Rev. Sci. Tech. 2000;19(2):405–24.
- Sa’idu L, Abdu PA, Umoh JU, Abdullahi US. Diseases of Nigerian indigenous chickens.
Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 1994;42:19–23.
- Mtei BJ, Msami,
H.M. Reflections on current animal health status in Tanzania. Tanzania
Veterinary Journal 1996; 16, 37– 49.
- Okoj L. Diseases as important
factors affecting increased poultry production in Uganda. Der Tropenlandwirt,
Zeitschrift in dentropen und Subtropen Jahrgang
1993;94:S37–S44.
- Sharma RN, Pandey GS, Khan AQ et al. Salmonella isolation from
poultry in the Republic of Zambia. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production
in Africa, 1991;39:173–175.
- Hamid MA, Sharma
RN. Epidemiology of fowl typhoid in and around Tripoli (Libya).
Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa
1990;38:315–317.
- Arbelot B, Dayon JF, Mamis
D et al. Sero survey of dominant avian diseases in Senegal:
mycoplasmosis, fowl typhoid and pullorum disease, Newcastle, infectious
bursal and infectious bronchitis diseases. Revue d’Elevage et de
Medicine Veterinarier des Pays Tropicaux, 1997; 50, 197–
203.
- Bouzoubaa K, Lemainguer
K, Bell JG. Village chickens as a reservoir of Salmonella
pullorum and Salmonella gallinarum
in Morocco. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1992;12:95–100.
- Mdegela RH, Yongolo MGS, Minga UM, Olsen JE. Molecular
epidemiology of Salmonella gallinarum in chickens in Tanzania. Avian
Pathology, 2000;29:5:457-463
-
Gordon
RF, Jordan FTW. Poultry Diseases 2nd Edition.Pp98-113. Bailliere
Tindall, a division of Caselle Ltd, 1982.
-
Olsen JE, Skon MN, Christensen JP et al. Gegnomic Lineage of
Salmonella Enterica Serotype Gallinarum . J. Med Microbiology
1996;45: 413–418.
-
Barrow
PA, Berchieri Jr. A, Al-Haddad O. The Serological Response of Chickens
to Salmonella Gallinarum-Salmoneka Pullorum Detected by Enzyme
- Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Avian Diseases 1992;36:227–236.
-
Falade S, Ehizokhale M
Salmonella and Escherihia coli strains isolated from poultry in
Ibadan, Nigeria. Bull. Anim. Hlth. Prod. In Africa. 1981;29:99
-
Anonymous. Standard methods for
testing avian sera for the presence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum
antibodies, 1966. Unpublished data. Personal communication at the National
Vetreinary Research Institute, Vom – Nigeria. Dr. Okwori
-
Beard CW, Hanson RP. Newcastle Disease. In.Disease of Poultry. (Eds.
M. S. Hofstad, H. J. Barnes, B. W. Calnek, W. M. Reid, H. W. Yoder).8th
ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames,
IA, 1984; pp. 452-470.
- Adene DF. Diseases
of Poultry in Nigeria. An overview of the problems and solutions. Tropical. Veterinarian,
1997;15:103–110.
-
Waltman
WD, Horne AM. Isolation of Salmonella from Chickens Reaching
in the Pullorum – Lyphoid Agglutionation Test. Avian Dis
1993;37: 805–810.
-
Office
International Des Epizoories (OIE) (World Organisation of Animal Health)
OIE Manual of Standards of Diagnostic Test and Vaccines; 2003.
-
Barrow
PA. Serological Diagnosis of Salmonella Serotype Enteritidis Infections
in Poultry by Elisa and other Tests. International Journal of Food
Microbiology1994 b;21:55–68.
-
Hassan
JO, Barrow PA, Mockett Apa et al. Antibody Response to
Experimental Salmonella Typhimurium Infection in Chickens Measured by
Elisa. The Veterinary Record 1990;126:519–522.
-
SojkaWJ, Field HA. Salmonellosis in England and wales 1958-67.
Vet Bulletin 1970;40:515-531
-
Pandy
VS. Epidemiology and Economics of Village Poultry Production in African.
Overview, in Pandey, VS and Demey F. (eds) Village Poultry
Production in Africa Rabat Morocco May 1992.
- Chrysostome CAAM, Bell JG, Demey F et al. Seroprevalences to three diseases
in village chickens in Benin. Preventive Veterinary Medicine
1995;22:257–261.
-
Onunkwo
O, Onoviran O. Serological survey of Mycoplasmosis and pullorum disease
in Plateau state of Nigeria. Kenya Veterinarian
1978;2:33
-
Oliveira GH
de, Berchieri Junior A, Montassier HJ et al. Assessment
of serological response of Chickens to Salmonella gallinarum
and Salmonella pullorum by ELISA Brazilian Journal
of Poultry science 2004;6:111-115.
-
Iba AM, Montassier MFS, Gama NMSQ et al. Utilizacao do ELISA
(Teste imunoenzimatico) na deteccao de portadores de Salmonella gallinarum
e Salmonella pullorum. Ars Veterinaria 1991;7:126-134
-
Adesiyun
AA, Bishu G, Adegboye DS et al. Serological Survey
of S. Pullorum Antibody in Chickens Around Zaria, Nigeria.
Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 1984;32:81–85.
|