|
|
OJHAS Vol. 7, Issue 4: (2008
Oct-Dec) |
|
|
Early Feeding After a Total Abdominal Hysterectomy |
|
Mary Flesher, Brenda Wagner, Lyn Jones, Richmond Hospital, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address For Correspondence |
Mary Flesher Richmond Health Services,
7000 Westminster Highway, Richmond, B.C., V6X 1A2
E-mail:
Mary.Flesher@vch.ca |
|
|
|
|
Flesher M, Wagner B, Jones L. Early Feeding After a Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Online J Health Allied Scs.
2008;7(4):2 |
|
Submitted: Oct 23, 2008; Revised: Feb
11, 2009 Accepted: Feb 12, 2009 Published: Feb 25, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
Background:
Oral fluids and food are traditionally introduced slowly after total
abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). This descriptive study examined
the effect and tolerance of early oral intake following this surgery. Methods:
A retrospective chart review was conducted on
164 patients who had been on a clinical pathway following TAH. Comparisons
in initiation of fluids and foods, and gastrointestinal effects were
made between the early fed group (n=82) and the traditionally fed group
(n=82). Results:
Both groups had the similar gastrointestinal symptoms postoperatively,
but the early fed group had an earlier bowel movement. The early
fed group had a statistically significant shorter length of stay.
Similar usage of anti-nausea medication and pain medication usage was
noted between the two groups, except for a lower usage of Tylenol #3
(acetaminophen with codeine) in the early fed group. Conclusions:
This study found that early feeding could
be tolerated well in TAH patients, with statistically significant improvements
in usage of some pain medication and length of stay were noted in the
early fed group.
Key Words:
Early feeding, Diet
tolerance, Total abdominal hysterectomy |
|
Traditionally,
patients are fed gradually following a total abdominal hysterectomy
(TAH), often withholding a regular diet until resolution of the postoperative
ileus.1 Studies that examined early feeding after
hysterectomy have shown to be safe and efficacious in this patient population.2-10 Kraus and Fanning11 found that early feeding
promoted bowel stimulation. Johnson et al.12 concluded
that early feeding following most gynecologic surgeries would improve
patient satisfaction and shorten hospital stay, thereby reducing costs.
The main concern regarding early feeding is that it may not be tolerated
because of postoperative ileus, causing nausea, vomiting, or loss of
appetite 13. Generally, studies have found that early
feeding is associated with multiple benefits such as reduced length
of stay8 and reduced gastrointestinal morbidity.2
With surgeries to the bowel, gut motility returns in 4-24 hours in the
small intestine, in 24-48 hours in the stomach, and in 48-72 hours in
the colon.11 Because of the limited manipulation of the
gastrointestinal tract during most abdominal hysterectomies, it is less
likely that the bowel is significantly disturbed.
At
the Richmond Hospital, patients are on a clinical pathway for abdominal
hysterectomy and typically receive a clear fluid on postoperative day
1, a full fluid diet on postoperative day 2 and a regular diet on postoperative
day 3. In October 2006, the gynecologists/obstetricians agreed
to shorten the time to start a regular diet, aiming to initiate a regular
diet within 48 hours of surgery, by eliminating the full fluid diet
progression. This practice change was added to the clinical pathway
at that time. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect
and tolerance of the postoperative diet after a hysterectomy between
the traditionally fed group (had full fluid diet), and early fed group
(no full fluids).
Once
ethics approval was granted from the University of British Columbia
Clinical Ethics Board and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute,
a comparative chart review of 164 charts was initiated. A review
was made of patients’ charts who had received a total abdominal hysterectomy
and were on the clinical pathway during the designated time periods.
This retrospective chart review looked at the following variables: anthropometrics,
surgery performed and reason for surgery, age, and postoperative days
of clear fluids, full fluids, and regular diet. Both traditional and
early fed groups were compared to determine the differences between
the two groups in gastrointestinal tolerance (nausea, vomiting, ileus),
amount of pain and anti-nausea medication used and time to first bowel
movement. The average length of stay was also compared between
both groups.
Means
and ranges were compared for all of the data collected in this descriptive
study. The information recorded was non-specific to individual
patients, and no identifiable information (name or personal health number)
was retained. Data to be collected from the early fed group (n=82)
and comparative traditionally fed group (n=82) was analyzed using the
Student t test for statistical significance. The sample size chosen
used alpha=0.05, 80% power (for 2-sided significance) based on information
obtained from Pearl et al.3, Ghosh et al.4, and
MacMillan et al.7
One
hundred and sixty four charts were reviewed retrospectively on patients
who had received a total abdominal hysterectomy. The 82 traditionally
fed group comprised patients who had surgery performed before October
2006. The 82 patients from the early fed group had surgeries performed
after January 2007. Both groups were similar in their BMI, age, reason
for surgery and type of surgery performed (Table 1).
Table 1: Characteristics of the study groups |
Characteristic |
Traditionally fed group (n = 82) |
Early fed group
(n = 82) |
Age |
50.1 ± 7.9 years |
48.3 ± 8.1 years
|
Body Mass Index (kg/m˛) |
25.1 ±
5.2 |
26.0 ±
4.5 |
Diagnosis: |
Fibroid uterus |
37 (45%) |
40 (49%) |
Cancer or mass |
18 (22%) |
13 (16%) |
Menorrhagia |
12 (15%) |
16 (20%) |
Endometriosis |
7 (9%) |
5 (6%) |
Cyst |
6 (7%) |
5 (6%) |
Other |
2 (2%) |
3 (3%) |
Surgery performed: |
Total Abdominal
Hysterectomy (TAH) |
42 (51%) |
41 (50%) |
TAH,
Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) |
31 (38%) |
33 (40%) |
TAH,
Left salpingo-oophorectomy (LSO) |
5 (6%) |
6 (7%) |
TAH,
Bladder neck suspension |
3 (4%) |
1 (1%) |
TAH,
Right salpingo-oophorectomy (RSO) |
1 (1%) |
1 (1%) |
Information
was collected on the use of pain medications and anti-nausea medications
between the two groups. Use of the medication was compared using the
Student t test for patient-controlled analgesic (PCA), Ibuprofen, Tylenol
#3 (acetaminophen with codeine), plain Tylenol, Demerol, Gravol and
Maxeran (Table 2). Each medication was compared with the F-test to determine
if should use equal variance or unequal variance, and then the traditional
group was compared with the early feeding group for significant difference
using the Student t-test.
Table 2: Medication Usage
Between Traditional Group Versus the Early Feeding Group |
Medication |
Traditionally fed group
(n = 82, p =
0.05) Mean Usage |
Early fed group
(n = 82, p =
0.05) Mean Usage |
Statistical Significance
(using Student t-test) |
Patient Controlled
Analgesia (PCA) (mg) |
17.0 mg |
18.3 mg |
No significant difference |
Ibuprofen (200 mg tabs)
|
3.6 tabs |
4.1 tabs |
No significant
difference |
Tylenol #3 (30 mg)
|
3.9 tabs |
2.3 tabs |
Significant difference |
Tylenol plain (325 mg)
|
7.7 tabs |
8.6 tabs |
No significant difference |
Demerol (50 mg)
|
0.21 tabs |
0.06 tabs |
No significant difference |
Gravol (50 mg)
|
45 mg |
50 mg |
No significant difference |
Maxeran (10 mg)
|
3.7 mg |
2.6 mg
|
No significant
difference |
Average
length of stay and time to first bowel movement were also compared to
see if any significant difference was found between the traditional
and early fed groups using means and averages. The number of patients
in the traditional group had more gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms than
the early fed group. More patients had a bowel movement prior
to discharge in the early fed group (52% versus 45% in the traditionally
fed group). Ileus was present in 5 patients in the traditionally
fed group, while 1 patient was reported to have an ileus in the early
fed group.
Nausea
and vomiting was reported in 48% (traditionally fed group) and 37% (early
fed group). Because the dietary adjustment occurred on the second
day post-operatively (traditionally fed group received a full fluid
diet while the early feeding group received a regular diet), GI symptoms
were evaluated on that day in particular. The number of patients
having GI symptoms (ileus, nausea, vomiting) in the traditionally fed
group was higher (7% of patients) versus the early feeding group (2%
of the patients). The average number of days to first bowel movement
postoperatively occurred 1.65 days sooner in the early fed group than
the traditionally fed group, which may have impacted the other GI symptoms
like ileus, nausea, and vomiting.
Length
of stay was also evaluated in this retrospective chart review. The mean
length of stay for the traditionally fed group was 4.30 days and for
the early fed group was 4.01 days. Comparing these two averages
using the F-test and Student t-test for unequal variance demonstrated
a significant difference between the two groups.
Dietary
management of total abdominal hysterectomy patients has traditionally
involved a postoperative progression of clear fluids to full fluids
to regular diet at the Richmond Hospital. With the change made
to eliminate the full fluid step on the clinical pathway for TAH, the
tolerance of an earlier regular diet was observed within this comparative
group of 164 patients. Although 37-48% of patients experienced nausea
and vomiting postoperatively in this study, the majority of it was experienced
in the first 24 hours of surgery. The results demonstrated a similar
or slightly better tolerance of a regular diet on the second day postoperatively
in the early fed group compared with the traditionally fed group, who
received full fluids.
Both
groups tolerated the advancement of the diet from clear fluids to regular
diet, with slightly lower number of GI symptoms reported in the early
fed group. McMillan, Kammerer-Doak, Rogers, and Parker 7
assert that taking foods earlier postoperatively may stimulate bowel
movements and peristalsis, thereby reducing the incidence of nausea.
Early feeding of a regular diet after total abdominal hysterectomy showed
no significant difference in most analgesic and anti-nausea medication,
except in the lower usage of Tylenol #3 in the early fed group, which
showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups.
Gastrointestinal tolerance and average length of stay were similar between
the two groups, but the time of first postoperative bowel movement was
sooner in the early fed group, impacting pain and anti-nausea medication
usage. Early postoperative feeding advancement after TAH was well
tolerated, and showed no adverse effects in patients placed on the current
clinical pathway.
- Morris
M, Burke TW. Surgery of the gastrointestinal tract in relation to gynecology.
In: Gershenson DM, DeCherney AH, Curry SL, eds. Operative
Gynecology 1993. Philadelphia: WB Saunders: 390-425.
- Pearl ML, Frandina
M, Mahler L, Valea FA, DiSilvestro PA, Chalas E. A randomized
controlled trial of a regular diet as the first meal in gynecologic
oncology patients undergoing intraabdominal surgery. Obstet
Gynecol. 2002;100:230-234.
- Pearl ML, Valea
FA, Fischer M, Chalas E. A randomized controlled trial of postoperative
nasogastric tube decompression in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing
intraabdominal surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:399-402.
- Ghosh K, Downs LS,
Padilla LA, Murray KP, Twiggs LB, Letourneau CM, Carson LF. The
implementation of critical pathways in gynecologic oncology in a managed
care setting: A cost analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83(2):378-382.
- Fanning J, Andrew
S. Early postoperative feeding after major gynecologic surgery:
Evidence-based scientific medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2001;185(1):1-4.
- Steed HL, Capstick
V, Flood C, Shepansky A, Schulz J, Mayes DC. A randomized controlled
trial of early versus “traditional” postoperative oral intake after
major abdominal gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2002;186(5):861-865.
- MacMillan SL, Kammerer-Doak
D, Rogers RG, Parker KM. Early feeding and the incidence of gastrointestinal
symptoms after major gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol.
2000;96(4):604-608.
- Schidler JM, Hurteau
JA, Look KY, Moore DH, Raff G, Stehman FB, Sutton GP. A prospective
controlled trial of early postoperative oral intake following major
abdominal gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;67(3):235-240.
- Wu L, Griffith P.
Early postoperative feeding and abdominal gynecological surgery.
Br J Nurs. 2005;14(1):42-46.
- Cutillo G, Maneschi
F, Franchi M, Giannice R, Scambia G, Benedetti-Panici P. Early
feeding compared with nasogastric decompression after major gynecologic
surgery: A randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(1):41-45.
- Kraus K, Fanning
J. Prospective trial of early feeding and bowel stimulation after
radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):996-998.
- Johnson C, Casto
C, Krammer J, Drake J. Postoperative feeding: A clinical review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000;55(9):571-573.
- Martindale RG,
Maerz LL. Management of perioperative nutrition support.
Curr Opin Crit Care 2006;12(4):290-294.
|