|
|
OJHAS Vol. 8, Issue 4: (2009
Oct-Dec) |
|
|
Web GIS and Public Health |
|
Alireza Taravat Najafabadi, Geoinformatics Department, Pune University, Pune,
India, Maryam Pourhassan, Health Science Department, Pune University, Pune, India |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address For Correspondence |
Alireza Taravat
Najafabadi, Kaliyaninear, Pune - 411014,
Maharashtra,
India.
E-mail:
Alireza.Taravat@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
Najafabadi AT, Pourhassan M. Web GIS and Public Health. Online J Health Allied Scs.
2009;8(4):4 |
|
|
Submitted: Nov 18, 2009;
Suggested Revision: Dec 4, 2009; Revised: Dec 7, 2009; Accepted:
Mar 31, 2010; Published: Apr 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
Both government and private sector
organizations are seeking ways to maintain and improve the health of
the public in the world to control the costs at the same time. For this
aim internet and use of georeferenced public health information for
Geographic Information System application is an important and exciting
development for the nation’s Department of Health and Human Services
and other health agencies. Technological progress towards public health
geospatial data integration, analysis, and visualization of space-time
events using the Web portends eventual robust use of Geographic
Information
System by public health and other sectors of the economy. Increasing
Web resources from distributed spatial data portals and global
geospatial
libraries, and a growing suite of Web integration tools, will provide
new opportunities to advance disease surveillance, control and
prevention,
and insure public access and community empowerment in public health
decision making.
Key Words: Web GIS; Internet; Public Health; Management.
|
|
Both
government and private sector organizations are seeking ways to maintain
and improve the health of the public in the world to control the costs
at the same time. While people have grown increasingly concerned with
the cost of acute and chronic care, insufficient attention has been
given to the role that public health data could have on strategies to
reduce the burden of disease. Hence a need arose for an easy way to
query, organize, combine, overlay, and plot health data. We describe
such a system that is accessed over the World Wide Web.
Geographic
Information System deployment through the Internet is a relatively new
technological development. The remarkable increase in use of the Internet
is creating new standards, and challenges, for the efficient use of
Web-based geospatial applications.(1) Challenges include spatial scale,
size of data files, data compression and transmission, and other conditions
for the extensive use of Geographic Information System functionality.
For public health applications, geospatial databases created for the
Web will have the added requirements to meet confidentiality safeguards
to insure the anonymity of the individual from disclosure.(2,3)
Geographic Information System and Web technologies offer emerging opportunities
to analyze complex geospatial data, solve problems, and present data
in a graphical format that public health decision makers and the public
can easily see and understand.(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Web
GIS in health science |
The
Internet is becoming the most efficient means available for electronic
communication of information and data (5) and the technology is evolving
rapidly. Accommodation of geospatial data is no exception, even though
constraints persist on bandwidth, transmission speed and integration.(6) The Internet can now provide timely access to geospatial
information.
It’s estimated that at least 80-90 percent of all government databases
contain georeferenced information (7) meaning data can be tied to a
specific location or place such as area code, latitude and longitude,
street address, and many other Census and political boundaries. This
suggests the Internet will, in fact, revolutionize our perception and
use of geographic and georeferenced information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobilization of public health |
There
are several tasks required in order to reach the goal of comprehensive
Internet geospatial readiness in public health. Perhaps the starting
point is to empower all public state and local health departments (LHDs)
with basic geospatial technology, tools and expertise. Insuring that
state and LHDs have, or have access to, the needed technology and
training
is a key investment for developing the nation’s public health geospatial
infrastructure--from the bottom up. Health database holdings containing
geographic or spatially referenced information then become essential
infrastructure content, standardized for Web interoperability, and
cost-effectively
shared.
Public
health is beginning to engage geospatial infrastructure-building tasks.
Geocoding is one of the most essential (8, 9) and the translation of
address information into corresponding latitudes and longitudes in
health
databases is a national public health goal.(10,11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confidentiality of public health geospatial data |
For
public health, a key constraint to the release of geospatial data on
the Web has been data confidentiality and the protection from any
unauthorized
disclosure, through location, of an individual’s identity. All health
agencies, including the Federal government (12), are highly sensitive
to any possible public release of data containing geographic identifiers
that could lead to the identification of an individual, without some
protective and thorough prerelease screening of the data.
Preparing and
sharing data for Geographic Information System mapping creates an additional
level of complexity to these concerns. Geographic Information System tools
easily can layer, parse and spatially reduce geospatial information from an
unlimited number of databases and potentially uncover unique geographic
locations on a map. Usual approaches to safeguard data against disclosure
include temporal or spatial aggregation, smoothing, and other masking
techniques. (13)
However,
new cautions for public health researchers must be exercised as in the
case of using geocoded records with Zip Codes. ZIP Codes and newly
created
Census Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) sharing the same 5-digit code
may not necessarily cover identical areas. The potential for
spatiotemporal
mismatches and privacy disclosures stemming from the replacement of
Zip Codes with ZCTAs in the 2000 census will require thorough examination and
new confidentiality guidelines for data release and GIS analysis.(14-18)This
information can be displayed with Geographic Information System static proximity
maps and posted on the Internet (Figure 1).(19)
|
Figure1.
The circle is ½ Kilometers radius around Police Office in Prospero,
CA. It contains residential locations (blue dot locations) and one “high
risk” (red dot) sex offenders. “Megan's Law" permits the release
of this geocoded information to the Internet. (Source: Prospero Police
Department,
Megan’s Law web site http://www.ci.Prospero.ca.nr/fpd/meganlaw/index.html) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
health
geospatial data on the internet |
The
availability of public health geospatial data on the Web is growing.
Most of these databases are available as either static or dynamic
mapping
products. The online cancer incidence
maps of New
York State Cancer Surveillance
Improvement or hypertension incidence maps of Esfahan City, Iran
Initiative
provide one of the more detailed static Web GIS displays of geographic
area and disease outcome. These maps compare individual zip Codes with
expected cancer incidence.(20) Where downloadable, static display data
from a source geospatial database could be prepared for use in a
Geographic
Information System.
In
contrast to static presentations, geospatial maps become dynamic when
users are allowed to access, or interact with, the database from their
own computer.(21-24) Users can customize maps and tables
and interactively query the database to search for features based partly
on their own criteria. These allow for a wider, but predetermined,
selection
of parameters and tools for geospatial analysis.
Today,
the promise of interoperability whereby geospatial data distributed
anywhere on the Web can be searched, located, retrieved and compiled,
either by a Web GIS service provider or at an individual’s desktop,
is becoming reality. This is a significant accomplishment given the
long-standing lack of industry consensus about hardware platforms,
operating
systems, network protocols and programming languages in support of Web
GIS use.(25) In fact, specifications are now being developed to
accommodate
these operational differences and allow Web GIS clients and desktop
users to fully integrate Web accessible geospatial data resources.
The
effort to “geoenable” the Web is being led by the Open
Geographic Information System Consortium (OGC). The development of
common
ground for integrated geospatial mapping applications (26) depends on
interface specifications designed to enable Geographic Information
System
interoperability of geospatial information regardless of operational
differences in the vendor environment. Geography Markup Language (GML)
is the base language developed by OGC, and GML is becoming the world
standard for eXtensible Markup Language (XML) encoding of geographic
features and geoprocessing service requests.(27,28) OGC standards
for interoperability will advance Web-based use of geospatial data.
The
availability of public health geospatial data, in a robust Geographic
Information System functional Web environment, is in a nascent state.
By comparison in USA and UK, many non-public health agencies have an
extensive Web GIS presence with digital geospatial data. Many of these
agencies, including EPA, USGS, FEMA, Bureau of Land Management in UK
(BLM), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration in USA (NOAA), National Aeronautics and Space
Administration
(NASA), Department of Transportation in USA (DOT) and Census Bureau
have long-established geospatial products and inventories related to
georeferenced themes, as part of their institutional mission
The
Intranet is helping many of these agencies to develop enterprise
Geographic
Information System activities. The Intranet provides advantages for
secure sharing and analysis of restricted geospatial information within
respective agencies. These activities may provide operational models
for public health where scarce Geographic
Information System resources can be similarly leveraged. Enterprise
Geographic Information System may become a workable strategy, as
evidenced
in a variety of non-public health settings, to unify Geographic
Information
System services for state.
For
example, in the case of the District of Columbia in USA (DC), the DC
GIS Atlas initiative was designed for employees at all levels of
District
government to have an Intranet access point to standardized, updated
Geographic Information System data, eliminating the need to search
disparate
resources for critical information.(29) The atlas consists of a
collection
of thematic mapping modules (e.g., public safety, transportation,
socioeconomic,
environmental, and others) that can pull information from a central
Geographic Information System server as well as from the databases of
all district agencies, depending on what kind of queries employee
request.
The atlas now offers over 130 map layers for the "average"
district employee and another 16 layers (available via a
password-protected
emergency management module) for authorized personnel. Several more
layers are under development.
A
point-notification tool exists that allows DC Atlas users to
encircle/polygon
areas of interest and receive all address/owner information for these
areas from the district’s tax and revenue database. This enables users
to easily generate mailing lists and a variety of other notification
services. Another powerful tool is a reporting capability that allows
users to compile all available information for a particular area (point
or polygon) as well as link to the various agency Intranet sites from
which the information originated. And, a mapping tool allows users to
plot data from any district database and perform "on-the-fly"
geocoding.(30)
Part
of the DC Atlas will become Internet-enabled sometime this year to
provide
full customer service with access to citizens. This extension to the
Internet will comprise a more limited selection of data layers from
the centralized Geographic Information System database but help serve
routine citizen needs concerning public health, maintenance, city
services.
Web
GIS will generate new opportunities to advance the mission of disease
surveillance, understanding and prevention, and the well being of the
nation. The overriding process to document, make accessible and share
geospatial information and data, in a Web-enabled environment, is
perhaps
the key condition of Geographic Information System Department.
In
order to build the foundation, every public health department and agency
needs to inventory its respective geospatial data holdings and, using
the appropriate identifying metadata, render these discoverable through
the Internet. Geospatial Web-searchable metadata will help public health
agencies to communicate and make known their geospatial resources to
internal and external users. Secure Intranet and Internet data sharing
solutions, that uphold all database safeguards of an individual’s
anonymity and confidentiality, can be adapted to public health.
All
public health agencies must become Web enabled and have access to basic
geospatial tools and training in order for public health to ultimately
become an integral part of Geographic Information System Department.
Investment in, and by, province and local health departments through
partnerships and other cost-effective data sharing mechanisms is crucial
to this process. Building a comprehensive and responsive geospatial
Web-enabled public health infrastructure is clearly an exciting, and
achievable, challenge for Iran’s public health.
- Leidner A, Homeland
Security Working Group, Federal Geographic Data Committee,
unpublished
data, January 31, 2002
- Foresman TA. Spatial analysis and mapping on the Internet. J of Public
Health
Manage Prac. 1999;5(4):57-64.
- Karr
A, Lee J, Sanil P. Web-based Systems that Disseminate
Information
from Data but Protect Confidentiality. In Elmagarmid AK, McIver WM. (ed). Advances in Digital
Government. Kluwer Press. Amsterdam. 2002. p 181
- Niemann B. XML Web Services: Virtual Centralization of
Distributed
Content. Unpublished data. 2002.
- Clarke
KJC, McLafferty SL, Tempalski BJ. On Epidemiology and
Geographic
Information Systems: A Review and Discussion of Future Directions. Emerging
Infectious Dis. 1996;2;(2):85-92
- Melnick AL.
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems in Public Health.
Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers, Inc. 2002.
- Federal Geographic
Data Committee. Geospatial Information One-Stop To Spatially
Enable
Delivery of Government Services.
2002.
Available at http://www.fgdc.gov
- Broome
FR, Meixler DB. The TIGER Data Base Structure. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems. 1990;17(1):39-47
- Cromley
EK, McLafferty SL. GIS and Public Health. New York: The
Guilford Press. 2002. p 104
- National Cancer
Institute. Geographical Information System for Health (GIS-H).
2002.
Available at
http://www.healthgis-li.com
- US Environmental
Protection Agency. Enviromapper.
2002.
Available at
http://epa.gov/superfund/sites/index.htm
- Grubesic
TH, Murray AT. Constructing the divide: Spatial disparities
in broadband access. Papers in Reg. Sci. 2002;81(2):197-221
- Rushton
G, Lolonis P. Exploratory spatial analysis of birth defect
rates in an urban population. Statistics in Medicine 1996;15:717-26
- Cox,
LH. Bounds on Entries in 3-Dimensional Contingency Tables Sub ject to Given Marginal Totals. In Inference Control in Statistical
Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2316, ed. J
Domingo-Ferrer. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2002.
pp. 21-33.
- Croner CM. Geographic Information
Systems (GIS): New Perspectives in Understanding Human Health and
Environmental Relationships. Stat. in Med. 1996;15:1961-1977
- Grossman RL. DataSpace Fact Sheet.
2001. Available at
http://www.dataspaceweb.net
- Steel
P, Sperling J. The Impact of Multiple Geographies and
Geographic
Detail on Disclosure Risk: Interactions between Census Tract and
ZIP Code Tabulation Geography", Proceedings of Survey Research
Methods Section, American Statistical Association. 2001.
- Richards TB, Croner
CM, Rushton G, Brown CK, Fowler L. Geographic Information Systems and Public
Health: Mapping the Future. Pub Health Rep. 1999;114(4):359-373
- Maryland. Department
of Planning. Hot Spot Communities & Spot Light Schools.
2002.
Available at
http://www.mdp.state.md.us
- Thrall GI. The Future of GIS in Public Health Management and Practice. J
of Pub Health Manage Prac. 1999;5(4):75-82
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NCHS Research Data Center. 2001.Available at:
http://www.cdc.gov/DataStatistics/
Croner CM. The Washington Geographic Information System Consortium. In Public
Health
GIS News and Information, ed. CM Croner
1999;11(31):17-20.
Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/gis.htm
Thrall SE. Geographic
Information System (GIS) Hardware and Software. J
of Pub Health Manage Prac. 1999;5(2):82-90
Soley MS, OMG Staff
Strategy Group. Model Driven Architecture.
2000.
Available at
http://www.omg.org/mda/presentations.htm
OpenGIS
Consortium 2005. Available at http://www.opensourcegis.org/
Peckenpaugh J.
Mapping agency blocks access, postpones outsourcing pact.
2001. Available at
http://www.govexec.com
Niemann B. Building Peer-to-Peer XML Content Networks of Web Services for Federal
Scientific and Statistical Data and Information: FedStats.Net and
Beyond. 2002.
Available at
http://www.gsa.gov
Taravat Najafabadi A. Applications of GIS in Health Sciences.
Shiraz E-Medical Journal 2009;10(4):221-230.Office for Civil
Rights. Medical Privacy-National Standards to Protect the
Privacy
of Personal Health Information: Final Modifications to the Privacy
Rule,
Federal Register, August 14, 2002. Available at
http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/finalreg.html
Yasnoff WA, Sondik
EJ. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in Public Health Practice in the New
Millennium. J of Public Health Manage Prac. 1999;5(4):ix-xii
|