|
|
OJHAS Vol. 9, Issue 2:
(2010 Apr - Jun) |
|
|
A comparative study of frequency of postnatal depression among subjects with normal and caesarean deliveries
|
|
Ganraj
Bhat Sankapithilu, Research Assistant, Department of Community Medicine, Mysore
Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Anil Kumar Mysore
Nagaraj, Senor Resident, Department of
Psychiatry, Mysore Medical College and
Research Institute, Mysore, Shrinivasa
Bhat Undaru, Asst. Professor, Department of psychiatry, K
S Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Raveesh
Bevinahalli Nanjegowda, Associate Professor and Head, Department
of Psychiatry, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Vinayak
Nagaraja, Research Assistant, Department
of Community Medicine, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute,
Mysore. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address For Correspondence |
Dr. Anil Kumar
M N, Senor Resident, Department of
Psychiatry, Mysore Medical College and
Research Institute, Mysore, INDIA
E-mail:
nagarajakm24@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
Sankapithilu GJ, Nagaraj AKM, Bhat SU, Raveesh BN, Nagaraja V. A comparative study of frequency of postnatal depression among subjects with normal and caesarean deliveries.
Online J Health Allied Scs.
2010;9(2):4 |
|
|
Submitted: May 12, 2010;
Accepted:
Jul 25, 2010; Published: Jul 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract: |
Background:
The prevalence of postnatal depression (PND) is 12-15%. Recent studies are
equivocal about the earlier inference that PND is higher among caesarian
than normal delivery. Objective:
The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of PND among
the Indian women and the association between the mode of delivery and
PND. Material and
method: Fifty subjects each; having delivered normally and by caesarian
section was chosen. All the women were within 3 months post delivery
and could understand Kannada language. Those who consented were asked
to complete the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Those found
to have scores suggestive of depression on EPDS were assessed for depression
according to ICD-10. The data was analyzed using paired t test and chi
square test. Result and conclusion: Among Post caesarean subjects,
depression was diagnosed in 20% (n=10) as compared to 16% (n=8) in subjects that
delivered normally. However there was no significant difference in the frequency
of depression among the two groups. Due to the small sample size the results
cannot be generalized.
Key Words: Postnatal
depression, EPDS, Caesarian delivery
|
|
Depression can be
described as feeling sad, blue, unhappy, miserable, or down in the dumps.
Most of us feel this way once in a while for brief periods. But true
clinical depression is a mood disorder in which feelings of sadness,
loss, anger, or frustration interfere with everyday life for an extended
time. Depression can be mild, moderate, or severe. Depressive disorders
are the major health problems because they
occur commonly throughout life, cause considerable suffering, and often
signal the beginning of long-term problems. Results from epidemiological
studies suggest that there are increased rates of major depression especially
for cohorts born since 1945 with earlier age of onset, in adolescence
and early adulthood, persistent gender effects for women, and family
effects for first-degree relatives.(1) The one-year prevalence of major depression in adults is usually
estimated to range between 9% and 14% in the general population. The
Global Burden of Disease study predicts that unipolar depression will
become the second most important cause of disability on a world-wide
basis by the year 2020.(2)
Depression having
an onset usually during the first 3 months after delivery is called
postnatal depression (PND) or peripartum depression. Major depression
in women has a peak onset during the childbearing years.(3) It has been successfully argued that this peak is not simply related
to more help-seeking behavior of women or just perceiving life events
as more stressful than men.(4) Three different postnatal psychiatric
disorders may appear in mothers during the 12 months following delivery,
including the maternity blues, puerperal psychosis and postnatal depression.
The most common mood disorder associated with childbirth is unipolar
major or minor depression occurring at any time during the first postnatal
year. PND is second only to caesarean section as the most frequent and
serious complication of childbirth.(5) After pregnancy, hormonal changes in a woman's body may trigger
symptoms of depression. During pregnancy, the amount of two female hormones,
estrogen and progesterone, in a woman's body increases greatly. In the
first 24 hours after childbirth, the amount of these hormones rapidly
drops back down to their normal non-pregnant
levels. This rapid change in hormone levels may lead to depression,
just as smaller changes in hormones can affect a woman's mood before
she gets her menstrual period. Occasionally, levels of thyroid hormones
may also drop after giving birth. Antenatal and community studies suggest
that 12 to 15 % of women suffer a non psychotic depressive disorder
in the weeks following childbirth.(6) Despite there being no great differences in the frequency of PND
worldwide(7), and the identification of PND in several non-western
settings, the emphasis towards recognition of PND among the Asian
population is inadequate. Evidence from social workers suggests that
Asian women are as likely to experience PND as Caucasian women. For
immigrant women, changes experienced in lifestyle, difficulties in language
and communication, along with the usual stressors like adaptation to
marriage, life with the in-laws and poor child birth experience during
delivery can exacerbate the stresses of parenthood. Overall, women are
not more likely to get depression in the first year after their babies
are born than women of a similar age who have not recently given birth,
but the risk of getting depression is much higher than average in the
first few weeks after having a baby. In the first five weeks after childbirth,
they are three times more likely to get depression than a woman who
has not had a baby in the last year.(8)
It has been shown
that major and minor depression, anxiety disorders and adjustment disorder
with depressed mood are more prevalent in the first three months postpartum
than in age-matched non-childbearing women. Between 40% and 70% of cases
of postnatal depression have their onset in the first three months postpartum.
PND often persists for many months, with estimates that 25% to 60% of
cases remit within three to six months postpartum and a further 15%
to 25% will remit within 12 months. A smaller proportion of cases continue
for years, with inadequate treatment probably contributing to chronicity.(9)
There appears to
be a similar prevalence in western and non-western cultures. However,
prevalence estimates are often based on inconsistent timing of assessments
and varying methods of diagnosis with small or unrepresentative subject
populations. Relying entirely on self-report measures to assess depression
in postpartum samples may produce questionable results (higher estimates
usually occur with self-report measures than with diagnostic interview
schedules). Many women experience significant somatic and cognitive-affective
changes following childbirth, but may not be clinically depressed. These
changes may be part of normal postpartum adjustment. Health professionals
need to be cautious to discriminate between difficult marital and parenting
adjustments in the early postnatal period and the symptoms of clinical
depression. Thus administering diagnostic interview schedules is a must
to confirm the presence of a clinical syndrome of depression detected
by rating scales/questionnaires. The table given below has the diagnostic
criteria of depression as per the two major diagnostic manuals.
Table 1: Nosological status of depressive
disorder (10,11)
ICD-10
Core symptoms
-
Depressed mood
-
Loss of interest and enjoyment
-
Easy fatigability
Accessory symptoms
-
Reduced concentration and
attention
-
Reduced self esteem and self
confidence
-
Ideas of guilt and unworthiness
-
Bleak and pessimistic views of
future
-
Ideas or acts of self harm or
suicide
-
Disturbed sleep
-
Diminished appetite
Depression graded according to
the presence of core and accessory symptoms:
-
Mild
depression: 2 core and 2 accessory symptoms
-
Moderate depression: 2 core and
3 or more accessory symptoms
-
Severe depression:
All 3 core and 3 or more accessory symptoms
For depressive episodes of all
three grades of severity, a duration of at least 2 weeks is usually required for diagnosis, but shorter periods may be reasonable
if symptoms
are unusually severe and of rapid onset. |
DSM IV TR
Major Depressive Episode
A. Five (or more) of the following
symptoms have been present during the same 2-week period and represent
a change from previous functioning; at least one of the symptoms is
either (1) depressed mood or (2) loss of interest or pleasure.
Note: Do note include
symptoms that are clearly due to a general medical condition, or
mood-incongruent delusions or hallucinations.
- Depressed mood most of
the day, nearly every day, as indicated by either subjective report
(e.g., feels sad or empty) or observation made by others (e.g., appears
tearful). Note: In children and adolescents, can be irritable mood.
- Markedly diminished
interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities most of the day,
nearly every day (as indicated by either subjective account or
observation made by others)
- Significant weight
loss when not dieting or weight gain (e.g., a change of more than 5% of
body weight in a month), or decrease or increase in appetite nearly
every day. Note: In children, consider failure to make expected weight
gains.
- Insomnia or hypersonic
nearly every day
- Psychomotor agitation
or retardation nearly every day (observable by others, not merely
subjective feelings of restlessness or being slowed down)
- Fatigue or loss of
energy nearly every day
- Feelings of
worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt (which may be
delusional) nearly every day (not merely self-reproach or guilt about
being sick)
- Diminished ability to
think or concentrate, or indecisiveness, nearly every day (either by
subjective account or as observed by others)
- Recurrent thoughts of
death (not just fear of dying), recurrent suicidal ideation without a
specific plan, or a suicide attempt or a specific plan for committing
suicide
B. The symptoms do not meet criteria
for a Mixed Episode.
C. The symptoms cause clinically significant distress or impairment
in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
D. The symptoms are not due to the direct physiological effects of a
substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical
condition (e.g., hypothyroidism).
E. The symptoms are not better accounted for by Bereavement, i.e., after
the loss of a loved one, the symptoms persist for longer than 2 months
or are characterized by marked functional impairment, morbid preoccupation
with worthlessness, suicidal ideation, psychotic symptoms, or psychomotor
retardation. |
Postnatal depression
is the most common complication of childbearing.(7) In this context the EPDS (Edinburg postnatal depression scale)
was developed by Cox and his co-workers to screen specifically for PND
in a community sample and concentrate on psychic aspects of PND.(12)
Many aspects of
postpartum depression have been studied (biochemical effects, socioeconomic
effects, etc.), but little has been done to study the relationship between
actual birth experience and the incidence and degree of postpartum depression.
There has, however, been one study indicating that postpartum depression
is more prevalent among women who have had caesarian births than women
who have had normal vaginal deliveries.
These researchers have found that the increased rates of postpartum
depression among caesarean subjects compared to those who underwent
a normal delivery were significant. The researchers also found that
among the caesarean subjects, those who had general
anesthesia (a significant intervention) displayed higher depression
rates than those who were given an epidural (the milder intervention).
A non-significant finding revealed that the depressive illness of caesarean
patients started sooner after birth than
the control group. (13) However the recent evidence in this regard
is equivocal.(25-28)
The aim of this
study is to investigate the frequency of PND in
Indian women getting delivered in a tertiary hospital and the association
between the mode of delivery and postnatal depression.
The study sample
was taken from the pediatric out-patient department of the tertiary
hospital by name Cheluvamba hospital, which is a teaching hospital attached
to the Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, located at Mysore,
Karnataka. Sample was collected during Oct 2009 to Feb 2010. This public
hospital renders health services to women within both
the rural and urban areas of Mysore and adjoining districts.
This is a cross
sectional hospital based study where in the patients were
chosen by purposive sampling technique. Patients with co-morbid physical
and psychiatric illnesses were excluded. All the women were within three
months post delivery and could understand
Kannada. The informed consent was taken prior to their participation
in the study. Women who did not know
Kannada were not included.
A total of 100 subjects
were selected, of which 50 women delivered by normal delivery and 50
by caesarean section. The subjects were selected from the pediatric
OPD when they came for the first monthly follow up of their children.
After obtaining the informed consent, the socio- demographic data was
collected initially from the subjects. Then each of them were provided
with the Kannada version of the EPDS and allowed to fill guiding them
wherever they had queries. For illiterates, the author assisted in filling
the questionnaire by vernacular translation. A cut-off score of
more than 12 was considered for the presence of depression. Those who
scored more than 12 on EPDS were interviewed by a psychiatrist as per
the criteria of ICD 10 to diagnose depression.
The psychiatrist was blind to the EPDS score.
The assessments on EPDS and ICD 10 for those subjects were done on the
same day.
The Edinburgh postnatal
depression scale: The EPDS was originally
developed to assist health professionals to screen community samples
of postnatal mothers for depressive symptoms following childbirth, after
a validation study on 84 post-partal women.
It is a ten item questionnaire, each item scored on a severity scale
of 0 to 3, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 30. It is recommended
to rate the presence of each symptom during the last 7 days. It is easy
to complete and found to be acceptable among child bearing women.
The cut-off score approved in many of the validation studies is 12-13.
It has a sensitivity of 86%, specificity
and positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% at this cutoff score. If
the cut-off is lowered to 9–10, the EPDS has 100% specificity and
sensitivity of 76%.(14)
The scale is a reliable
reflection of women’s mood at the time of completion, and a useful
indicator of those who may be suffering from depression. A score of
over 12 indicates the likelihood of depression, but does not provide
a measure of severity; as some women who scored over 18 met DSM-II criteria
for minor depression; and others scoring 14 to 16 met the criteria for
major depression. Therefore, EPDS scores should not be interpreted as
indicating diagnosis in either clinical settings or for research purposes. The EPDS does not predict postnatal depression. The optimal score threshold
of 12.5 has been confirmed in subsequent studies.(15) However, one
study reported that with the recommended cut-off level of 13, three
women who had major depression for at least a year were not detected.
False negative scores are a serious problem in clinical practice, and
clinical judgment must always take precedence over scores on a self
report scale. One study recommended a cut-off of 14–15 in screening
for major depression, as all cases of RDC major depression were detected
at this level. The selection of a cut-off score depends upon the purpose
of the assessment and a lower threshold may be useful for community
screening to identify all possible cases of depression.(16)
The original EPDS
scale was used to create a unique completely translated version of the
scale in kannada by the author who is competent in speaking, reading
and writing Kannada. This Kannada translation was given to a linguist
who was blind to the English version of EPDS and asked to back translate
it to English. The translated version was completely similar to the
English version of the original EPDS.
Statistical analysis
: The statistical
analysis was performed using SPSS version 11.0 for windows.
Descriptive statistics were applied to obtain means and frequencies
of socioeconomic and clinical data of the sample. The clinical data
as well as the scores on EPDS were evenly matching across the two study
groups. Hence paired t test was used for comparative statistics of scores
on EPDS. To analyze the level of significance in frequency of depression across
the two groups, chi-square test was used.
This is a hospital
based cross sectional study, in which we compared 50 women each having
delivered normally and by caesarian section method. The groups were evenly
matched with respect to clinical variables like age, weight, height
and blood pressure as well as years of education. This has been summarized
in the Table 2.
Table 2: Physiological Variables |
Items |
Mean ±
Standard deviation |
t value |
P value |
Age |
Normal(N=50)
|
24.30 +3.82 |
1.13 |
0.26 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
23.46+3.59 |
Systolic BP (mm of Hg) |
Normal(N=50) |
118.80+10.10 |
-4.83 |
0.63 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
119.88+12.16 |
Diastolic
BP (mm of Hg) |
Normal(N=50) |
76.24+8.02 |
-4.43 |
0.65 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
77.12+11.54 |
Weight in kg |
Normal(N=50) |
58.72+7.67 |
-0.45 |
0.64 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
59.36+6.19 |
Years
of education |
Normal(N=50) |
7.44+5.05 |
0.62 |
0.53 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
6.72+5.96 |
Height in cm |
Normal(N=50) |
147.98+7.18 |
-0.54 |
0.58 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
148.78+7.43 |
Majority of the
women (51%) were within the age group of 21- 25 years. Most of them
were house wives (45%), thirty percent of them were
laborers and two percent were students. Majority of them (53%) belonged
to the lower middle class. Sixty percent of the women lived in the extended
family set up, rest of them in the nuclear family. Eleven percent was
illiterates. Majority of the women (83%) belonged to the rural and suburban
areas of Mysore, Chamarajnagar and Mandya districts in Karnataka. The
above demographic variables did not vary significantly across the two
study groups.
The mean EPDS scores
of the total sample (N=100) was 10.03+ 5.89. Individual mean
scores of each of the items in the EPDS
as well as the total score, with respect to both normal and caesarian
section has been summarized in the table 3.
The comparison of the scores between the two modes of delivery showed
that women with caesarian delivery had higher rates
of postnatal depression than normal delivery, though it was not statistically
significant. Among the mean values of individual items in the EPDS,
the item which assesses how the person reacts to everyday problems (item6)
significantly varied (p=0.01) across the two groups,
favoring normal delivery as shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Scores on EPDS across the two groups |
Items |
|
Mean +SD |
t value |
P value |
EPDS1 |
Normal(N=50) |
1.22+1.09 |
-0.19 |
0.84 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
1.26+0.94 |
EPDS2 |
Normal(N=50) |
1.22+1.21 |
-0.18 |
0.85 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
1.18+0.94 |
EPDS3 |
Normal(N=50) |
0.82+0.84 |
-1.06 |
0.28 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
1.02+1.02 |
EPDS4 |
Normal(N=50) |
1.22+1.03 |
-0.57 |
0.56 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
1.34+1.04 |
EPDS5 |
Normal(N=50) |
1.00+0.94 |
-1.28 |
0.20 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
1.24+0.91 |
EPDS6 |
Normal(N=50) |
0.64+0.85 |
-2.61 |
0.01 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
1.10+0.90 |
EPDS7 |
Normal(N=50) |
0.74+0.82 |
-0.98 |
0.32 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
0.90+0.78 |
EPDS8 |
Normal(N=50) |
0.76+0.79 |
-1.20 |
0.23 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
0.96+0.85 |
EPDS9 |
Normal(N=50) |
0.94+0.84 |
-0.37 |
0.70 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
0.88+0.74 |
EPDS10 |
Normal(N=50) |
0.68+0.84 |
-0.26 |
0.79 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
0.72+0.64 |
EPDS
(Total) |
Normal(N=50) |
9.26+6.38 |
-1.31 |
0.19 |
Caesarian(N=50) |
10.80+5.31 |
EPDS detected depression
in 30% of the subjects at a cutoff score of 13. (Score of up to 12 was
considered as normal). In that, (n=13) 26% of the women who delivered
normally were detected to have depression as compared to (n=17) 34%
in women delivering by caesarian section. On evaluation of these 30%
subjects by ICD-10, 18% of them were
found to have syndromal depression. This is represented in the bar diagram
below.
|
Fig1: Proportion
of depressed and non-depressed patients |
Further, among
the two groups, 16% of those who delivered normally were depressed as compared
to 20% by caesarian delivery. On comparing the two groups using the chi-square
test, it was found that they did not differ significantly (p=0.738).
The present investigation
was undertaken to study whether there is any difference in the frequency
of postnatal depression for different modes of delivery. The available
recent literature is equivocal regarding the postnatal complications
after cesarean delivery.(17,18) Thus the study was carried out on
a hypothesis generated based on the available literature. Out of a sample
size of 100 obtained by purposive sampling technique, 18% was found
to be depressed in this cross-sectional study. This corresponds to the
world-wide prevalence rate of 12-15% found commonly in many of the community
surveys of post-natal depression.(19-23)
however some of the studies have demonstrated PND in
up to 60%.(24) Further, on comparison of the two study groups, 16%
of those who delivered by normal delivery were
found to have depression as compared to 20% among the subjects of cesarean
delivery. Though the latter developed depression slightly more than
the former, there was no statistical significance. The authors did not
come across a similar cross-sectional comparative study of modes of
delivery for PND. However there are studies that have compared quality
of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and
cesarean section.(17,25-27) These recent studies infer that there
is no significant advantage of one mode of delivery over the other for
mental health related quality of life. But the physical health related
quality of life was better with normal vaginal delivery. In one study,
mothers in normal delivery group reported a better health related quality
of life and slightly scored higher (better) on the SF-36 questionnaire.
However the authors of that study note that the low sample size (n=100)
limit their results to be generalized.(17) The recent evidence from
a meta-analysis study also does not support significant differences
in postpartum depression between women who have normal vaginal delivery
or caesarean section.(28) Our study also supports this finding.
This is a cross-sectional
study where subjects were recruited by purposive sampling technique.
The subjects were assessed one month after delivery. Most of the studies
in this area are prospective ones where assessments were made at two
or three times during early post-partum.(17,22,23,29) The advantage
with cross-sectional study is that there is no attrition. Further, the
incidence of PND being more common during the first three months following
delivery, the time period of assessment is crucial. Prospective studies
are useful in assessing the speed of recovery from depression, which
may vary for different modes of delivery. However our aim was to know
whether the rates of PND differed for different modes of delivery and
hence single assessment a month after delivery was preferred.
Many studies have
looked into the biological and psycho-social etiological factors for
PND. The most accepted biological factors are the sudden change in reproductive
hormonal levels, past and family history of depressive disorder.(5,6,30-32) Most common psycho-social factors, especially in Indian
set up are gender bias (preference to male child), violence against
women, economic deprivation and poor social support.(22) However we
did not emphasize on such factors in our study. A study observed that
adverse psychological impact was more severe with emergency caesarian
section than with elective ones.(13) We did not look into such an effect
in our study. Though our study has reported rates of depression similar
to other studies, and also supports other studies in having no significant
difference in the rates of psychological morbidity for different modes
of delivery, our sample size is small. Thus we cannot generalize the
results of this study.
The authors wish
to graciously thank Prof. Lancy D'souza, Department of Psychology, University
of Mysore for statistical analysis of the data. We are also grateful
to Dr Krishnamurthy, Prof. of pediatrics and Medical Superintendent, Cheluvambha hospital, Mysore for
his permission to do the project at Cheluvambha hospital. Our sincere
thanks to Dr. Raj Gopal and Dr. Narendra Kumar, faculty of the Dept of
Psychiatry, Mysore Medical college and Research Institute, Mysore for
the review of the manuscript.
- Klerman GL, Weissman
MM. Increasing rates of depression.
JAMA.1989; 261(15):2229-35.
- O Hara MW, Swain AM.
Rates and risk of postpartum depression-A Meta analysis. Int Rev Psychiatr.
1996;8:37-54
- Weismann M, Olfson
M. Depression in women: Implications for health care research. Science.
1995. 269; 799-801.
- Weissman MM, Klerman
GL. Sex differences and the epidemiology of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry.
1977;34:98-111
- Gregoire AJ, Kumar R, Everitt B et al. Transdermal estrogen for treatment
of severe postnatal depression. Lancet. 1996;347(9006):930-933
- Cooper PJ, Murray L. Postnatal depression.
BMJ. 1998;316:1884–1886.
- Upadhyaya A, Creed F,
Upadyaya M. Psychiatric morbidity among mothers attending a well baby
clinic: A cross cultural comparison. Acta psychiatric Scandinavia. 1989;81:148-151
- Bostock J, Marsen M,
Sarwar Z et al. Postnatal depression in Asian women. Community nursing 1996;2(10):34-36
- McCutcheon H.
Postnatal depression — A systematic review of published scientific
literature to 1999. Australian Journal of Midwifery. 1999;17(4):11-16
- World Health Organization.
The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical
descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva; 1992
- American Psychiatric
Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental disorders. 4th
edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC. American Psychiatric Association
Press. 2000.
- Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R.
Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.
British Journal of Psychiatry. 1987;150:782-786.
- Edwards DR,
Porter SA, Stein GS. A pilot study of postnatal depression following caesarean section delivery.
J psychosom Res. 1994;(2):111-7.
- Murray D, Cox J L.
Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression
Scale (EPDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol.
1990;8(2):99–107.
- Cox JL, Murray D, Chapman
G. A controlled study of the onset, duration and prevalence of postnatal
depression. Br J Psychiatry. 1993;163:27–31
- Murray L, Carothers
AD. The validation of the EPDS on a community sample. British
J Psychiatry. 1990;157:2878-2900
- Tokran B, Parsay S,
Lamyian M et al. Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal
delivery and caesarian section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;
9:4.
- The effect of birth
experience on postpartum depression. Available at
clearinghouse.missouriwestern.edu/manuscripts/59.php
Accessed on May
8th, 2010
- Cox JL, Connor V, Kendell
RE. Prospective study of psychiatric disorders of childbirth. British
J Psychiatry. 1982; 140: 111-17.
- O’Hara MW, Zekoski
EM, Philips LH et al. Controlled prospective study of postpartum mood
disorders: Comparison of child bearing and non-childbearing women. Journal
of Abnormal Psychology. 1990;99:3-15.
- Josefsson A, Angelsioo
L, Berg G et al. Obstetric, somatic and demographic risk factors for
postpartum depressive symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(2):233-8.
- Patel V, Rodrigues
M, Desouza N. Gender, poverty and postnatal depression: A study of mothers
in Goa, India. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(1):43-47.
- Sood M, Sood AK. Depression
in pregnancy and postpartum period. Indian Journal of Psychiatry.
2003;45(1):48-51.
- Halbreich U, Karkun
S. Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression
and depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord. 2006;91:97-111.
- Lee SY, Lee KA. Early
postpartum sleep and fatigue for mothers after caesarian delivery compared
with vaginal delivery: an exploratory study. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs.
2007;21:109-113.
- Shindl M, Birner P,
Reingrabner M et al. Elective caesarian section vs spontaneous delivery:
a comparative study of birth experience. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand.
2003;82:834-840.
- Jansen AJG, Essink-Bot
ML, Duvekot JJ et al. Psychometric evaluation of health related quality
of life measures in women after different types of delivery. J Psychosom
Res. 2007;63:275-281.
- Carter FA, Frampton
CM, Mulder RT. Caesarian section and postpartum depression: a review
of the evidence examining the link. Psychosom Med. 2006;68:321-330.
- Yonkers KA, Ramin SM,
Rush AJ et al. Onset and persistence of postnatal depression in an inner
city maternal health clinic system. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:1856-1863.
- Forty L, Jones L, Macgregor
S et al. Familiality of postpartum depression in unipolar disorder:
results of a family study. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1549-1553.
- Kendell RE, Chalmers
JC, Platz C. Epidemiology of puerperal psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:662-673.
- Bloch M, Schmidt PJ,
Danaceau M et al. Effects of gonadal steroids in women with a history
of postpartum depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:924-930.
|