Case Report
Retinal Dysplasia Mimicking Retinoblastoma.
Authors
Ravikumar HN, RV Metropolis Diagnostic and Healthcare Centre Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore,
Vani Ravikumar, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore
Santosh KV, RV Metropolis Diagnostic and Healthcare Centre Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore,
Annie Joji, RV Metropolis Diagnostic and Healthcare Centre Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore.
Address for Correspondence
Dr. Ravikumar HN,
RV Metropolis Diagnostic and Healthcare Centre Pvt. Ltd.,
No. 7 & 21, 10th Cross,
Yellappa Garden, Malleswaram,
Bangalore - 560003.
E-mail:
drravikumar@metropolisindia.com
Citation
Ravikumar HN, Vani R, Santosh KV, Joji A. Retinal Dysplasia Mimicking Retinoblastoma. Online J Health Allied Scs.
2012;11(3):10. Available at URL:
http://www.ojhas.org/issue43/2012-3-10.htm
Open Access Archives
http://cogprints.org/view/subjects/OJHAS.html
http://openmed.nic.in/view/subjects/ojhas.html
Submitted: Aug 3,
2012; Accepted: Oct 4, 2012; Published: Oct 25, 2012 |
|
|
|
| Introduction
Leukocoria, an abnormal white reflection from the retina, is a condition caused by several lesions. The causes of leukocoria include Retinoblastoma and also non-tumorous conditions like Persistent Hyperplastic Primary Vitreous, Coat’s disease, congenital cataract and retinal dysplasia. It is of vital importance that Retinoblastoma be differentiated from the rest of the non-tumorous conditions as treatment options and prognosis are different in cases of retinoblastoma. Retinal dysplasia represents a rare cause of leukocoria. It is the congenital anomaly in which the retinal layer forms a disordered proliferative lesion and leads to congenital blindness in children.
Case Report
We received an enucleated specimen of the left eye from a case of a one year old child with leukocoria in both eyes since birth, the eye being enucleated following a clinical diagnosis of retinoblastoma.
The gross specimen consisted of an eyeball measuring 2 x 1.8 x 1.5 cm. The cornea measured 1.2 x 0.9 cm. At the posterior end, soft tissue bit 2.0 cm long was present. Cut section showed reddish brown material with central tiny grey-white area of 0.8 cm diameter in the retrolental region.
On microscopy, portions of normal eyeball tissue were identified in the anterior segment. In addition, the section from the retrolental tissue showed swirls and whorls of uniform cells in multiple layers reminiscent of normal retinal epithelium. These cells had uniform round nuclei with speckled chromatin, scant cytoplasm and indistinct cell membranes. (Fig. 1) At several places these cells were arranged in rosette-like formations with central lumina typical of Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes. (Fig. 2) No nuclear atypia was evident. No necrosis or calcification was noted. The skeletal muscle fibers and neural fibers from the posterior end of the specimen were within normal limits. Histological features were that of ‘Retinal Dysplasia’.
A request for chromosomal study was made, but was declined by the patient’s parents. The other eye was left in situ.
 |
 |
Figure 1: Cells arranged in multilayered swirls and whorls (H&E, X100) |
Figure 2: Rosette-like arrangement of cells resembling Flexner-Wintersteiner rosettes (H&E, X400) |
Discussion
The normal histology of the retina is characterized by the ordered orientation of cells forming a multilayered tissue. When this orderly arrangement of the retinal layers is disrupted, retinal dysplasia results. The term “retinal dysplasia” was first described by Reese and Blodi in 1950. [1] Retinal dysplasia may be unilateral or bilateral; the latter is often associated with congenital conditions like Trisomy 13, Norrie’s syndrome and Warburg syndrome. [2, 3, 4] An X-linked dominant inheritance has been described. [4] Retinal dysplasia is an extremely rare condition; the exact incidence cannot be ascertained as the term “retinal dysplasia” has been used in various contexts to indicate any congenital anomaly of the retina. To the best of our knowledge, only one such case is reported from India. [5]
The major histopathologic differential diagnosis to be considered while making a diagnosis of retinal dysplasia is retinoblastoma, both having in common the presence of rosettes. The rosettes of retinoblastoma are composed of anaplastic cells with poor differentiation while cells of rosettes in retinal dysplasia are more uniform and bland. Moreover, the rosettes in retinal dysplasia show a fundamental alteration in arrangement as observed on immunohistochemical study – the outer nuclear layer is present centrally and the lumen is lined by outer limiting membrane, while the inner nuclear layer is present more peripherally. [2] In addition, the cells lining the rosettes in retinal dysplasia have been shown by immunohistochemistry to be populated by a more diverse population than the rosettes in retinoblastoma. The cells in retinoblastoma are positive for cone opsin while those of retinal dysplasia stain for rod opsin and focally for Muller cells. [2, 6] Other helpful features that distinguish retinoblastoma are the presence of mitoses, necrosis and calcification. (Table 1)
| Table 1: Features helpful in differentiating retinoblastoma from retinal dysplasia on microscopy |
Character |
Retinoblastoma |
Retinal dysplasia |
Cells |
Undifferentiated |
Uniform |
Mitoses |
Frequent |
Rare |
Necrosis, calcification |
Present |
Absent |
Rosettes (IHC) |
Positive for cone opsin |
Positive for rod opsin and Muller cells |
Layers in rosettes (IHC) |
No pattern |
Reversal of normal pattern |
Other common causes of leukocoria can be excluded on histology: Coat’s disease shows cholesterol clefts and foamy macrophages, Persistent Hyperplastic Primary Vitreous contains fibrovascular tissue and Retinocytoma is composed of numerous rosettes. [7]
Retinal dysplasia presenting as leukocoria may be mistaken for retinoblastoma clinically. The routine microscopic findings may also simulate a retinoblastoma. Nevertheless, there are microscopic features that are distinctive enough to warrant a confident diagnosis of retinal dysplasia. The need to not misdiagnose this as a retinoblastoma is of extreme importance given the drastic contrast in prognosis between the two conditions.
Acknowledgement: The authors wish to thank Dr Geeta Vemuganti, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad for her valuable opinion.
References
- Reese AB, Blodi FC: Retinal dysplasia. Am J Ophthalmol 1950;33:23.
- Chan A, Lakshminrusimha S, Heffner R, Gonzalez-Fernandez F. Histogenesis of retinal dysplasia in trisomy 13. Diagn Pathol. 2007;2:48.
- de Graaf P, van der Valk P, Moll AC, Imhof SM, Schouten-van Meeteren AY, Castelijns JA. Retinal dysplasia mimicking intraocular tumor: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1731-1733.
- Lloyd IC, Colley A, Tullo AB, Bonshek R. Dominantly inherited unilateral retinal dysplasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77(6):378-80.
- Agarwal N, Gupta P, Agarwal A, Pantola C. Retinal Dysplasia – A Mimic of Malignant Ocular Pathology. J of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2011:5(2);367-368.
- Gonzalez-Fernandez F, Lopes MB, Garcia-Fernandez JM, Foster RG, De Grip WJ, Rosemberg S, Newman SA, VandenBerg SR. Expression of developmentally defined retinal phenotypes in the histogenesis of retinoblastoma. Am J Pathol. 1992;141(2):363-375.
- Eagle EC. Ch 11, Retinoblastoma and other pediatric intraocular tumors. In Eye Pathology – An Atlas and Basic Text. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. 1999. p. 199-205.
|
