Introduction
Approximately
half of all pregnancies, totalling 121 million or
331,000 per day on average each year globally, are
unintended (1). Though the unintended pregnancies
have declined globally, this rate remains
considerably high in developing countries (2). In
India, data from the first three rounds of
National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) conducted
during 1992-93, 1998-99, and 2005-06,
respectively, indicate that approximately
one-fourth of the women reported their pregnancies
as unwanted (3,4). However, the subsequent fourth
and the fifth round of the NFHS conducted in
2015-16 and 2019-21 showed only one percent
decline in this proportion (5,6). The fifth round
of the NFHS conducted in (2019-21) estimates that
eight percent women stated that their pregnancy
was unwanted and exhibited nine percent unmet need
for contraception (6). This reveals that women who
want to stop childbearing are still not using
contraceptives, resulting in an unwanted birth.
The idea of unwanted pregnancy had been of great
importance for demographers to depict fertility
behaviour and estimate the levels of unmet need
for contraception and family planning. Preventing
an unwanted pregnancy was an integral part of
achieving the Millennium Developmental Goal and is
still an indispensable part of the Sustainable
Development Goal.
India, being the
most populous country in the world, faces unique
challenges in reproductive health and family
planning. During the 1950s, policymakers realized
that with India's limited resources, the country's
growing population could dampen its economic
growth. Over the years, India has taken various
measures to tackle population growth and family
planning issues. In the London Submit 2012, India
committed to spending $3 billion by 2020 for
family planning programs, to improve the access,
choice and quality of family planning services and
to increase modern contraceptive usage from 53.1%
to 54.3% and to ensure that the three-fourths of
the demand for modern contraceptives is fulfilled
by 2020 (7).
Unwanted births in
India represent a crucial concern within the realm
of reproductive health and family planning (8,9).
These pregnancies can negatively impact the
quality of life of the mother and the child (10).
Pregnancy can be unintended for various social and
economic reasons, for example, no desire to have
an additional child at the moment, unavailability
of financial resources to bear the expenses of
another child, lack of access to contraception
(8,11). Unwanted pregnancies result mainly from
the ambivalent fertility desires of women or their
spouses during their fertility course. These
ambivalent women may change their fertility
desires attributed to various reasons, like the
desire to have more sons (12,13) and the loss of a
child (14,15). Studies reflect that various
factors contribute to unwanted pregnancies in
India, such as the place of residence, religion
and ethnicity of household, age of mother, age at
marriage, duration of the marriage, age at first
cohabitation, education of mother and father
(16–18) contraceptive use (16,19), and husband's
decision on fertility (14,20–22).
Many studies on
unwanted birth indicate an under-estimation of the
unwanted birth using a cross-sectional study
design where women may consider their unwanted
pregnancy as wanted post-delivery or at the time
of raising the child (23–26). Various studies have
adopted different methodologies to measure
unwanted pregnancies using the cross-sectional
study design. John Bongaarts (1990) was the first
to measure the wanted pregnancy using information
on the desire for more children (24). A study
based on India by Kulkarni and Choe (1998)
proposed an actual and wanted parity progression
ratio to measure wanted pregnancy (27).
Pregnancies have also been measured as wanted or
unwanted based on the women's self-reporting of
their pregnancy status as wanted or unwanted (28).
A recent study based on cross-sectional data
estimated unwanted pregnancies based on ideal and
actual living children (29).
Estimation of
unwanted births based on cross-sectional data has
its own limitations. On the other hand, the panel
study design provides a unique opportunity to
calculate the exact measure of unwanted births in
India, and its main risk factors. The use of the
panel data set can help determine the changing
reproductive intentions and attitudes. The
availability of panel data on sexual preferences
provides a unique opportunity to bring about a
different perspective on fertility choices and
behaviour. Furthermore, panel studies offer the
best way to determine whether ambivalent women
behave according to their intentions (13).
Studies on unwanted
pregnancies using cross-sectional data have
concentrated mainly on two questions - desired and
the ideal number of children (24,29), which may
change over time. Using a panel study design can
result in the accurate prevalence of unwanted
births in India. Using a panel study like the
Indian Human Development Survey (IHDS) to estimate
unwanted pregnancy holds significant importance
for policy makers and planners because it provides
a more precise estimate than that obtained through
cross-sectional data with potential bias. Against
this background, this study endeavours to estimate
the prevalence of unwanted pregnancy and its
determinants utilizing the first two rounds of the
IHDS data conducted during 2004-05 and 2011-12.
Data source
The present study
uses the two rounds of the IHDS data, IHDS I and
II, conducted during 2004-05 and 2011-12,
respectively. In IHDS I, the total sample
consisted of 215,754 individuals across 41,554
urban and rural households covering all states and
union territories of India, except Andaman,
Nicobar and Lakshadweep islands. The IHDS II
survey interviewed 42,152 households and covered
204,568 individuals from 1420 villages and 1042
urban blocks of India; around 83% were
re-interviewed consisting of 204,569 individuals
across 42,152 urban and rural households and
25,479 eligible women covering all states and
union territories of India, except for Andaman,
Nicobar and Lakshadweep islands. A total of 2134
new households were added in IHDS-II, and thus
they did not have a counterpart in IHDS-I. The
6911 households from IHDS-I did not have an
counterpart in IHDS-II since they were lost due to
follow-up. Therefore only 22,962 married and
fertile women in the IHDS-I (2004-05) survey were
selected for the analysis. For the present study,
only the status of the child as being wanted or
unwanted is considered, and the pregnancies or
births that were mistimed were not included.
Outcome
variables
The principal
interest of the study was to check an unwanted
pregnancy between the surveys. The eligible
women's responses to the desire to continue
childbearing in IHDS-1 (2004-05) was utilized.
Women's willingness to continue childbearing was
obtained by asking, "Do you want more children (in
addition to the child you are now carrying?". The
response categories were: "No", "No sterilized
(Husband)", "Not fertile anymore", "Yes", and
"Unsure". For analysis purposes, the categories
were recorded as: 'wants more' (want another
child) and 'no more' (those who don't want any
more children). Women who considered themselves
infecund in IHDS-I were not included in the
analysis. The dependent variable was dichotomous
with "0" occurrence of no live birth in between
the surveys of those who stated “No” desire for
another child in IHDS-I and "1" occurrence of at
least one live birth in between the survey of
those who stated “No” desire for another child in
IHDS-I."
Independent
variables
The study
incorporated a range of independent variables at
the community, household, and individual levels,
encompassing the mothers and children. The
community-level variables was the place of
residence (rural/urban). The household-level
variables included wealth index (poorest, poorer,
middle, richer, richest) a proxy for the
socio-economic status of the household, religion
(Hindu, Muslim, Others), and caste (Scheduled
Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), Other backward
class (OBC), Others). The caste of the women is
categorized based on the frequency distribution
and also according to the DHS–India (2015-16)
categorization of caste (5). Individual-level
variables included women’s age in completed years
(less than 20, 20-24, 25-29, 30-39, 40 and above),
woman's education (no education, primary
education, secondary education, higher education),
duration of marriage (0-4, 5-9, 10-14, more than
15 years), current contraceptive use (not using,
using), husband desire for more children (doesn't
want, want); total number of living son (no son,
one son, two sons and 2+ son); ideal number of
children in relation to actual living children
(ideal=actual living children, ideal>actual
living children, Ideal <actual).
Statistical
measures
For this study, the
data from the women's files from the two rounds of
the IHDS survey was merged to construct a panel
dataset. Subsequently, pooled binary logistic
regression analysis was conducted to determine the
predictors of unwanted pregnancies among
currently-married women. The adjusted odds ratio
(AOR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were
calculated. Additionally, descriptive and
univariate analyses was also conducted on the
panel data to investigate the socio-economic and
demographic variables linked to unwanted
pregnancies among women in India. All statistical
analyses were performed using Stata version 14.
Conceptual
framework
The conceptual
framework expands upon prior knowledge to
elucidate the connection between unwanted
pregnancies and the socio-demographic and life
cycle factors that underlie them. During IHDS-I, a
group of women expressed their intention of not
having any more children; however, some of them
did indeed give birth in the inter-survey period
between IHDS-I and IHDS-II. This suggests that a
range of community, household, and individual
factors might have influenced the women who
experienced live births during the inter-survey
period. These factors could potentially contribute
to the occurrence of unwanted pregnancies. Figure
1 provides a representation of the conceptual
framework.
Results
To provide a
different perspective on the significance of
responses regarding the desire to continue
childbearing, the reproductive behaviour of
currently married women in IHDS-I (2004-05) and
their willingness to continue childbearing was
analyzed. Table 1 reveals that in IHDS-I, out of
the total number of women surveyed, 39% did not
desire to continue childbearing, 21% desired to
continue childbearing, while 40% had either been
sterilized or had become infecund.
Table 1: Percent
distribution of currently married women
according to their child desire, IHDS-1,
India, 2004-05
|
Desire to continue childbearing
|
N
|
Percentage
|
Don't want Child
|
9,007
|
39.23
|
Want Child
|
4,696
|
20.45
|
Sterilized/not fertile
|
9,259
|
40.32
|
Total
|
22,962
|
100.0
|
Among the 9,007
women who did not wish for more children, 26%
experienced an unwanted birth between the two
survey periods (Table 2).
Table 2: Percentage Distribution of
currently married by their child desire in
IHDS-1 and birth outcome in IHDS-2, India,
2004-05 and 2011-12
|
Desire for a child (IHDS-1)
|
IHDS-II
|
No birth % (N)
|
At least one live birth in
between the survey % (N)
|
No
|
74.38 (6,928)
|
25.62 (1,947)
|
Yes
|
21.43 (1,051)
|
78.57 (2,987)
|
Sterilized/infecund
|
97.50 (9,786)
|
2.50 (263)
|
Total
|
17,765
|
5,197
|
To measure the
extent of unwanted births among currently married
women who did not want any more children in IHDS-I
(2004-05), we presented the percentage
distribution of women who had experienced unwanted
births during the inter-survey period, categorized
according to the background characteristics (Table
3).
Table 3: Percent
distribution of currently married women
who stated a preference for no more
children but who had in-between birth by
selected covariates, India, 2004-05 and
2011-12
|
Background characteristics
|
N
|
Percentage
|
|
Place of residence
|
Rural
|
1641
|
84.3
|
0.000
|
Urban
|
306
|
15.7
|
|
Religion
|
Hindu
|
1547
|
79.5
|
0.000
|
Muslim
|
330
|
17.0
|
|
Others*
|
69
|
3.6
|
|
Caste
|
OBC
|
732
|
37.6
|
0.000
|
SC/ST
|
669
|
34.4
|
|
Others
|
546
|
28.0
|
|
Age of women
|
<20
|
83
|
4.3
|
0.000
|
20-24
|
624
|
32.1
|
|
25-29
|
652
|
33.5
|
|
30-39
|
533
|
27.4
|
|
40+
|
55
|
2.8
|
|
Educational Status
|
No Education
|
1102
|
56.6
|
0.000
|
Primary
|
284
|
14.6
|
|
Secondary
|
514
|
26.4
|
|
Higher
|
46
|
2.4
|
|
Economic status
|
Poorest
|
405
|
20.8
|
0.000
|
Poor
|
467
|
24.0
|
|
Middle
|
442
|
22.7
|
|
Richer
|
355
|
18.3
|
|
Richest
|
278
|
14.3
|
|
Duration of Marriage
|
0-4
|
320
|
16.5
|
0.000
|
5-9
|
704
|
36.2
|
|
10-14
|
466
|
23.9
|
|
15-19
|
271
|
13.9
|
|
20+
|
186
|
9.6
|
|
Contraception status
|
Not Using
|
1256
|
64.5
|
0.000
|
Using
|
377
|
19.4
|
|
Missing
|
314
|
16.1
|
|
Husband Desire
|
Don't Want
|
1607
|
82.6
|
0.000
|
Want
|
143
|
7.3
|
|
Missing
|
197
|
10.1
|
|
Number of Son
|
No son
|
476
|
24.5
|
0.000
|
1son
|
759
|
39.0
|
|
2son
|
468
|
24.0
|
|
2+son
|
237
|
12.2
|
|
Missing
|
8
|
0.4
|
|
Desire number of children in
relation to actual living children
|
Ideal=actual
|
415
|
21.3
|
0.000
|
Ideal<Actual
|
121
|
6.2
|
|
Ideal>Actual
|
1339
|
68.8
|
|
Missing
|
71
|
3.7
|
|
Note: Source: Panel
Survey IHDS-I (2004-2005) and IHDS-II
(2011-2012); N= Total Number of unweighted
cases; Percentages are weighted; * Jain,
Christian, Sikh, Buddhist
|
The associations
between unwanted births and the independent
variables were tested using chi-square tests at 5%
significance level. Out of total unwanted births,
a little over four-fifths of unwanted births were
from rural areas, and only 16% were from urban
areas. Religion and caste had a crucial role in
determining women's fertility behaviour. Among all
religious groups, four-fifths of the unwanted
births were among Hindus, followed by Muslims.
There was not much difference between the unwanted
births reported by the women from SC/ST (34%) and
OBC (38%). Around one-fifth of the women from
other caste group reported unwanted birth. Older
women and those in long-term marriages exhibited
more consistent behaviour compared to younger and
recently married women, who had a higher incidence
of unwanted births between the two survey periods.
The use of contraception among those who
experienced unwanted births was approximately 19%,
while non-users accounted for around 65%,
indicating the unmet need for contraception.
Husband’s desire had a significant association
with in determining subsequent fertility.
Multivariable
model result
The binary logistic
regression model was carried on after adjusting
for all covariates to examine the factors
affecting unwanted pregnancies. The results of the
multivariable logistic regression model are
presented in Table 4, showing the AOR of unwanted
births with a 95% CI.
Table 4: Adjusted odds ratio along with
95% CI to examine the effect of different
covariates on unwanted pregnancy, India,
2004-05 and 2011-12
|
Background characteristics
|
AOR (95% CI)
|
Place of residence
|
Rural
|
1.00
|
Urban
|
0.84**(0.72, 0.98)
|
Religion
|
Hindu
|
1.00
|
Muslim
|
2.81***(1.73, 4.59)
|
Others
|
1.09 (0.79, 1.52)
|
Caste
|
Others
|
1.00
|
OBC
|
1.39***(1.12, 1.71)
|
SC/ST
|
1.41***(1.13, 1.77)
|
Age of women
|
<20
|
1.00
|
20-24
|
0.43***(0.28, 0.67)
|
25-29
|
0.23***(0.15, 0.36)
|
30-39
|
0.09***(0.06, 0.15)
|
40+
|
0.02***(0.01, 0.03)
|
Educational Status
|
No education
|
1.00
|
Primary
|
0.66***(0.53, 0.81)
|
Secondary
|
0.58***(0.48, 0.69)
|
Higher
|
0.82 (0.61, 1.1)
|
Economic status
|
Poorest
|
1.00
|
Poor
|
0.99 (0.79, 1.25)
|
Middle
|
0.96 (0.75, 1.23)
|
Richer
|
0.87 (0.68, 1.12)
|
Richest
|
0.96 (0.75, 1.22)
|
Duration of Marriage
|
0-4
|
1.00
|
5-9
|
0.67 (0.18, 2.43)
|
10-14
|
0.39 (0.11, 1.41)
|
15-19
|
0.26**(0.07, 0.96)
|
20+
|
0.14***(0.04, 0.52)
|
Contraception status
|
Not Using
|
1.00
|
Using
|
0.21***(0.18, 0.24)
|
Missing
|
1.14 (0.83, 1.57)
|
Husband Desire
|
Don't Want
|
1.00
|
Want
|
5.80***(4.72, 7.11)
|
Missing
|
0.73***(0.61, 0.88)
|
Number of Sons
|
No son
|
1.00
|
1 son
|
0.52***(0.43, 0.63)
|
2 sons
|
0.29***(0.23, 0.37)
|
2+sons
|
0.40***(0.3, 0.53)
|
Missing
|
0.48***(0.3, 0.78)
|
Ideal number of children in
relation to actual living children
|
Ideal=actual
|
1.00
|
Ideal<Actual
|
0.22***(0.16, 0.28)
|
Ideal>Actual
|
4.63***(3.94, 5.46)
|
Missing
|
1.36 (0.9, 2.06)
|
Source: Panel Survey IHDS-I (2004-2005)
and IHDS-II (2011-12); *p<0.1;
**p<0.05; ***p<0.000
|
After controlling
for the background factors, it was found that
Muslim women had significantly higher odds (AOR =
2.81, 95% CI = 1.73–4.59) of experiencing unwanted
births. Women belonging to the SC/ST caste were
more likely to experience unwanted births than
women belonging to others caste groups (AOR =
1.41, 95% CI = 1.13-1.77). Women aged 40 years and
above were less likely to report unwanted births
(AOR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.01-0.03) relative to
younger women (less 20 years). Women's educational
level also showed a significant association with
unwanted births. Women with primary education were
less likely to experience unwanted births (AOR =
0.66, 95% CI = 0.53-0.81) compared to the women
with no formal education. The duration of marriage
also significantly affected unwanted births. Women
married for more than 15 years had lower odds of
experiencing unwanted births (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI =
0.07-0.96) compared to women married for 0-4
years. Contraceptive use was another significant
determinant of unwanted pregnancies, with modern
contraceptive users 79% less likely to report
unwanted births (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.18-0.24)
compared to non-users of contraceptives.
In a patriarchal
social setup, women's decisions are often
influenced by their spouse's desires, especially
regarding fertility choices. After controlling for
other factors, it was found that if a woman's
husband desired for more children, then women had
5.80 times higher odds of experiencing unwanted
births (95% CI = 4.72-7.11) compared to women
whose husbands did not want additional children.
Son preference is prevalent in India, especially
among couples with no sons. To achieve their
desired number of children, couples may continue
childbearing practices until they have the desired
number of sons. The results reflect that women
with at least one son were 50% less likely to
experience unwanted pregnancies (AOR = 0.52, 95%
CI = 0.43-0.63) compared to women with no sons.
Additionally, achieving the desired fertility was
a significant predictor of unwanted pregnancies.
Women whose desired number of children exceeded
their actual living children had 4.63 times higher
odds of experiencing undesired pregnancies (95% CI
= 3.94-5.46) than women whose ideal number of
children matched their actual number of children.
Discussion
The study focuses on
the unwanted pregnancy that has emerged as one of
the global public health concerns. The study
addresses the ambivalent fertility intentions
among currently married women in India using the
IHDS panel data conducted during 2004-05 and
2011-12. The study hypothesizes that a woman has
experienced unwanted pregnancy if she stated no
desire for an additional child in IHDS-I and has
experienced a live birth between the two survey
periods that is IHDS-1(2004-05) and IHDS-II
(2011-12). The results showed that among the women
who wanted to cease childbearing in IHDS-I, 74%
were successful in averting an unwanted birth in
the follow-up period. Nevertheless, 26% women
among those who had no desire for an additional
child in IHDS-I reported an unwanted birth between
the two survey periods.
In the multivariable
regression analysis, ambivalent fertility
intention was an independent predictor of birth
avoidance. The regression results indicated that
Muslim women were more uncertain about their
fertility intentions and were significantly more
likely to experience unwanted births between the
survey periods. Previous studies have also found a
significant relationship between Muslim women and
unwanted pregnancies (16,30–33). Among Muslims,
the act of abortion is considered to be "haram",
which means crime; this might be a possible reason
for the unwanted pregnancies among them (34–37).
Moreover, the knowledge and use of contraception
among Muslim women from the poorest households was
found to be lower compared to their Hindu
counterparts (5). According to the fourth round of
the NFHS, the unmet need for spacing was also
highest among Muslims compared to other religions
in India (5). Thus, the policies should focus on
Muslim women as unwanted pregnancy among them is
comparatively higher than women belonging to other
religions.
Women residing in
rural areas were found to experience more unwanted
births than urban women. On similar lines, a study
conducted using the Demographic health surveys
data set of sub-Saharan African countries
concluded that rural women were more likely to
experience an unwanted birth than women residing
in urban areas (38). On the contrary to this, a
study conducted in India stated that urban women
were more ambivalent about their fertility
intentions than rural women (16), as the ideal
family size is relatively smaller in the urban
setting than in the rural area which results in
more inconsistency in the fertility outcomes among
the urban women. A study on Bangladesh also found
higher unintended pregnancies among the women
residing in urban areas relative to rural areas
(39). Education also increases the odds of more
consistent fertility outcomes among women. The
logistic analysis results suggested that more
educated women were less likely to experience an
unwanted than uneducated women. A cross-sectional
study conducted in India also showed that as the
education level of the women increases, the odds
of pregnancy be unwanted decreases (16).
Most rural women are
not well educated, which prevents them from
properly using contraceptive methods (40,41),
which in turn results in higher levels of unwanted
pregnancies among them. The odds of unwanted
pregnancy decrease with the increase in the
household's economic condition, which suggests
that a woman belonging to a higher wealth quintile
had a higher purchasing power to avail the family
planning services than the women belonging to
lower wealth quintiles (42–44). Also, a study
conducted in India and the United States on a
similar line showed that women from higher wealth
quintile are less likely to report unwanted
pregnancies than women from lower wealth quintile
households (42,44). Moreover, a study conducted in
10 countries concluded that women from poor
households were less likely to receive family
planning services than women from higher wealth
quintile households (45).
Women who have
uncertainty in their fertility intention pose a
significant challenge to family planning programs.
It is expected that women who do not desire
additional children should use contraceptives to
limit their family size. However, the study
findings show that these women were not using
contraceptives in IHDS-I (2004-05). A study
conducted in an Indian setting also concluded that
the women using contraceptives were 36% less
likely to conceive an unwanted pregnancy than the
non-users of contraceptives (19). Fertility
decisions are often situational and depend on the
current circumstances, which can be modified in
the given time. Still, the results from the
present study, in a way, hint towards the role of
patriarchy and desire for the son, which changes
the course of fertility intention and results in
an unwanted pregnancy.
The multivariable
regression analysis also indicates that the
woman's decision on desired fertility is
influenced by her husband's choices. The husband's
desire for another child showed a significant
positive relationship with the woman's subsequent
fertility, which indicates that a woman's
reproductive behaviour is very much influenced by
her spouse's desire for an additional child.
Previous studies also showed that the husband
plays a crucial role in altering the fertility
intentions of the woman (14,20–22). Also, son
preference cannot be ignored in a patriarchal
set-up like India. The study also showed that
having no son was essential in deviating from the
previous fertility intentions. The deviations in
the fertility intentions could be influenced by
the society, in-laws, or driven by the husband's
intention to have more sons. The husband’s
preference for the sex of a child has a high
impact on the fertility levels of a country (46).
Previous studies in
India indicated that women tend to stop their
childbearing as they reach the desired number of
sons than a daughter (47,48). The present study
used a panel study design for the analysis. As the
objective of the study was to only measure the
unwanted pregnancy, so we haven't captured the
changes in fertility intentions from IHDS-I to
IHDS-II was not captured. Also, since the data is
quantitative and at the two-time points, we cannot
capture the in-between survey factors, leading to
unwanted pregnancy. So, we have used the
covariates at the time period 1 and found their
association with the unwanted bearing among the
currently married women in India, which is
generally used in many studies (32,49–51).
Conclusion
Unwanted pregnancies
in India are a pressing issue that merits
comprehensive exploration, and this study,
utilizing panel data, contributes valuable
insights into this complex phenomenon. The use of
panel data is essential in providing more robust
and less biased results compared to
cross-sectional studies, as it allows us to track
changes and dynamics over time (52). This research
aligns with existing studies that have noted
discrepancies between retrospective and
prospective surveys in estimating the prevalence
of unwanted pregnancies (53,54). These findings
underscore the importance of methodological rigour
when investigating sensitive issues like unwanted
pregnancies and offer a more accurate foundation
upon which to base policy decisions and family
planning programs. The implications of our
findings are significant for the design of future
family planning programs in India. Despite the
government's long-standing efforts to provide a
range of contraceptive options since the 1950s,
the persistence of a substantial number of
unwanted pregnancies in India remains a formidable
challenge. Our study highlights a high unmet need
for contraception in the country, emphasizing the
urgency of addressing this issue. Moreover, our
research underscores the need for holistic
approaches to combat unwanted pregnancies. This
includes educational initiatives aimed at altering
societal perceptions of gender and promoting the
value of the girl child. While commendable
initiatives like "Beti Bachao Beti Padhao
Yojna" have been launched, our findings
suggest room for further improvements. These
programs should not merely target girls but should
also engage with parents, communities, and
households to remove deeply ingrained gender
biases. Furthermore, counseling and education for
couples should be prioritized in India's family
planning strategy. In a context where husbands
play a pivotal role in fertility decisions, it is
imperative to include them in discussions around
family planning. By engaging both women and men in
conversations about contraception, family size,
and reproductive health, we can promote more
informed and empowered choices, ultimately
reducing the incidence of unwanted pregnancies.
Abbreviations
NFHS National Family Health Survey
SC Scheduled Caste
ST Scheduled Tribe
OBC Other Backward Class
AOR Adjusted Odds ratio
DHS Demographic and Health Surveys
IHDS Indian Human Development Survey
CI Confidence Interval
WHO World Health Organization
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any
organization for the submitted work.
Data availability
The present study is based on a large dataset
that is publicly available on the India Human
Development Survey (IHDS) conducted by the
National Council of Applied Economic Research
(NCAER) in India. The data is accessible from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/DSDR/series/507
Declaration of Conflicting
Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of
interest with respect to the research, authorship,
and/or publication of this article.
Ethics approval statement
This study requires no ethics approval for the
authors as the analysis used only de-identified
existing unit record data from the Indian Human
Development Survey. We confirm that all methods
were performed in accordance with the relevant
guidelines and regulations.
References
- UNFPA. State of World Population 2022: Seeing
the Unseen: The Case for Action in the Neglected
Crisis of Unintended Pregnancy [Internet]. 2022.
Available from:
https://esaro.unfpa.org/en/publications/seeing-unseen
- WHO. New estimates show worldwide fall in
unintended pregnancies since 1990-1994
[Internet]. 2020. Available from:
https://www.who.int/news/item/23-07-2020-new-estimates-show-worldwide-fall-in-unintended-pregnancies-since-1990-1994
- International Institute for Population
Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey
(MCH and Family Planning), India 1992-93.
Bombay: IIPS; 1995.
- International Institute for Population
Sciences (IIPS) and ORC Macro. National Family
Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99: India. Mumbai:
IIPS; 2000.
- IIPS, ICF. National Family Health Survey
(NFHS-4) 2015-16 India. International Institute
for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. 2017.
- IIPS. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5)
India Factsheet. 2021.
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
Government of India. India’s Vision FP 2020.
2014.
- Hajizadeh M, Nghiem S. Does unwanted pregnancy
lead to adverse health and healthcare
utilization for mother and child? Evidence from
low- and middle-income countries. Int J
Public Health [Internet]. 2020;65(4):457.
Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7275006/
- Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended
pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and
outcomes. Stud Fam Plann. 2010;41(4):241–50.
- Khajehpour M, Simbar M, Jannesari S,
Ramezani-Tehrani F, Majd HA. Health status of
women with intended and unintended pregnancies.
Public Health [Internet].
2013;127(1):58–64. Available from:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23200101/
- Haffejee F, O’Connor L, Govender N, Reddy P,
Sibiya MN, Ghuman S, et al. Factors associated
with unintended pregnancy among women attending
a public health facility in KwaZulu-Natal, South
Africa. South African Fam Pract [Internet].
2018 Jun 22 [cited 2024 Jul 4];60(3):79–83.
Available from:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20786190.2017.1396790
- Mutharayappa R. Son preference and its effect
on fertility in India. 1997.
- Withers MH, Tavrow P, Adinata NA. Do
ambivalent women have an unmet need for family
planning? A longitudinal study from Bali,
Indonesia. Women’s Health Issues.
2011;21(6):444–9.
- Robitaille M-C, Chatterjee I. Sex-selective
abortions and infant mortality in India: the
role of parents’ stated son preference. J
Dev Stud. 2018;54(1):47–56.
- Jayachandran S. Fertility decline and missing
women. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2017;9(1):118–39.
- Dixit P, Ram F, Dwivedi LK. Determinants of
unwanted pregnancies in India using matched
case-control designs. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth [Internet]. 2012;12. Available
from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22883933/
- McNay K, Arokiasamy P, Cassen R. Why are
uneducated women in India using contraception? A
multilevel analysis. Popul Stud (NY).
2003;57(1):21–40.
- Ram F, Singh A. Is antenatal care effective in
improving maternal health in rural Uttar
Pradesh? Evidence from a district level
household survey. J Biosoc Sci. 2006;38(4):433–48.
- Begum S, Dwivedi S, Pandey A, Mittal S.
Association between domestic violence and
unintended pregnancies in India: findings from
the National Family Health Survey-2 data. Natl
Med J India. 2010 Jul-Aug;23(4):198-200.
- Bélanger D. Son preference in a rural village
in North Vietnam. Stud Fam Plann.
2002;33(4):321–34.
- Blau FD, Kahn LM, Brummund P, Cook J,
Larson-Koester M. Is There Still Son Preference
in the United States? National Bureau of
Economic Research; 2017.
- Dasgupta M, Zhenghua J, Bohua L, Zhenming X,
Chung W, Hwa-Ok B. Why is son preference so
persistent in East and South Asia? A
cross-country study of China, India and the
Republic of Korea. J Dev Stud.
2003;40(2):153–87.
- Cleland J. Marital Fertility Decline in
Developing Countries: Theories and Evidence. In:
Hobcraft JC and J, editor. Reproductive ve
Change in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford
University Press; 1985.
- Bongaarts J. The measurement of wanted
fertility. Popul Dev Rev. 1990;16(3):487–506.
- Rosenzweig MR, Wolpin KI. Maternal
Expectations and Ex Post Rationalizations: The
Usefulness of Survey Information on the
Wantedness of Children. The Journal of Human
Resources. 1993;28(2):205-229
- Brown SS, Eisenberg L. The best intentions:
Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of
children and families. National Academies Press;
1995.
- Kulkarni S, Choe MK. Wanted and Unwanted
Fertility in Selected States of India. Natl
Fam Heal Surv Subj Reports. No 6, Feb
1998.
- Gipson J, Koenig M, Hindin M. The effects of
unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and
parental health: a review of the literature. Stud
Fam Plann. 2008 Mar;39(1):18–38.
- Dixit P. Consistency in Reporting Fertility
Intention in India: Prospective and
Retrospective Approaches. Soc Sci Spectr
[Internet]. 2017;2(3):183–94. Available
from:
https://www.socialspectrum.in/index.php/sp/article/view/76
- Adhikari R, Soonthorndhada K, Prasartkul P.
Correlates of unintended pregnancy among
currently pregnant married women in Nepal. BMC
Int Health Hum Rights [Internet].
2009;9(1):1–10. Available from:
https://bmcinthealthhumrights.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-698X-9-17
- Chacko E. Women’s use of contraception in
rural India:: a village-level study. Health
Place. 2001;7(3):197–208.
- De Silva WI. Consistency between reproductive
preferences and behavior: the Sri Lankan
experience. Stud Fam Plann. 1991;22(3):188–97.
- Joshi HL. Health Status Index, Rajasthan:
Spatio-temporal Appraisal at Panchayat
Samiti/block Level. Concept Publishing Company;
2007.
- Albar MA. Induced Abortion From an Islamic
Perspective: Is It Criminal Or Just Elective? J
Family Community Med [Internet]. 2001 Dec
1 [cited 2024 Jul 3];8(3):25. Available from:
/pmc/articles/PMC3439741/
- Silverman JG, Gupta J, Decker MR, Kapur N, Raj
A. Intimate partner violence and unwanted
pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, and
stillbirth among a national sample of
Bangladeshi women. BJOG An Int J Obstet
Gynaecol. 2007 Oct;114(10):1246–52.
- Kasule OH. Social and religious dimensions of
unwanted pregnancy: an Islamic perspective. Med
J Malaysia. 2003 Mar;58 Suppl A:49–60.
- Al-Matary A, Ali J. Controversies and
considerations regarding the termination of
pregnancy for Foetal Anomalies in Islam. BMC
Med Ethics [Internet]. 2014;15(1):1–10.
Available from:
https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6939-15-10
- Ameyaw EK, Budu E, Sambah F, Baatiema L,
Appiah F, Seidu AA, et al. Prevalence and
determinants of unintended pregnancy in
sub-Saharan Africa: A multi-country analysis of
demographic and health surveys. PLoS One
[Internet]. 2019;14(8):e0220970.
Available from:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0220970
- Roy TK, Singh BP. Correlates of Unwanted
Births in Bangladesh: A Study through Path
Analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016 Oct
1 [cited 2024 Jul 19];11(10). Available from:
/pmc/articles/PMC5053476/
- Çakmak A, Ertem M. An Important Opportunity
for Family Planning Education: Mothers with
Children Hospitalized in Children Governmental
Hospital, Diyarbakir-2004. Dicle Tıp Derg. 2005;32(4):190–5.
- Sarder A, Islam SMS, Maniruzzaman, Talukder A,
Ahammed B. Prevalence of unintended pregnancy
and its associated factors: Evidence from six
south Asian countries. PLoS One [Internet].
2021 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Jul
22];16(2):e0245923. Available from:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245923
- Williams L. Determinants of unintended
childbearing among ever-married women in the
united states: 1973-1988. Fam Plann Perspect
[Internet]. 1991 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Jul
5];23(5):212. Available from:
https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/doi:10.2307%2F2135755?sid=ebsco:plink:crawlerandid=ebsco:doi:10.2307%2F2135755
- Mozumdar A, Acharya R, Mondal SK, Shah AA,
Saggurti N. India's family planning market and
opportunities for the private sector: An
analysis using the total market approach. Int
J Health Plann Manage. 2019
Oct;34(4):1078-1096.
- Williams RJ. Storming the Citadels of Poverty:
Family Planning under the Emergency in India,
1975–1977. J Asian Stud [Internet].
2014;73(2):471–92. Available from:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-asian-studies/article/abs/storming-the-citadels-of-poverty-family-planning-under-the-emergency-in-india-19751977/976936DA6279A5D1612A4AEB997DAACA
- Sine J. How Much Is Enough? Estimating
Requirements for Subsidized Contraceptives:
Results from a Ten-Country Analysis. Commercial
Market Strategies Technical Paper Series.
Washington, DC: Commercial Market Strategies;
2002.
- Kumar V, Singh KK, Kumar P, Singh P. Does
family composition drive future fertility desire
and contraceptive use? An evidence based on
National Family Health Survey (2015–2016),
India. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021;121:105860.
- Vlassoff C. Fertility intentions and
subsequent behavior: a longitudinal study in
rural India. Stud Fam Plann.
1990;21(4):216–25.
- Vlassoff C. Desire for sons and subsequent
fertility in rural India. A 20-year longitudinal
study. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44(3):345.
- Roy TK, Sinha RK, Koenig M, Mohanty SK, Patel
SK. Consistency and predictive ability of
fertility preference indicators: Longitudinal
evidence from rural India. Int Fam Plan
Perspect. 2008;138–45.
- Stephenson R, Koenig MA, Acharya R, Roy TK.
Domestic Violence, Contraceptive Use, and
Unwanted Pregnancy in Rural India. Stud Fam
Plann. 2008;39(3):177.
- Bahk J, Yun S-C, Kim Y, Khang Y-H. Impact of
unintended pregnancy on maternal mental health:
a causal analysis using follow up data of the
Panel Study on Korean Children (PSKC). BMC
Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):85.
- Yeatman S, Sennott C. The Sensitivity of
Measures of Unwanted and Unintended Pregnancy
Using Retrospective and Prospective Reporting:
Evidence from Malawi. Matern Child Health J.
2015;19(7):1593–600.
- Casterline JB, El-Zeini LO. The estimation of
unwanted fertility. Demography.
2007;44(4):729–45.
- Koenig MA, Acharya R, Singh S, Roy TK. Do
current measurement approaches underestimate
levels of unwanted childbearing? Evidence from
rural India. Popul Stud (NY). 2006;60(3):243–56.
|